Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
stackoverflow.blog
Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#2What about GCP and other providers?
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#3when they're plotting %azure vs %aws, they should really be using the same range for both axes. then they could get rid of the dashed line that shows what the ratio is.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#4As a related side note, I sent a support request to Vultr twice in the last week and both times I got a response within 5 minutes. All follow up responses for both those tickets were also within a few minutes.
Their uptime has been rock solid and performance consistently great for the 2 years I've been with them.
I dare say most projects (even moderately big ones) would do just fine without the mega cloud.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#5As a related side note, I sent a support request to Vultr twice in the last week and both times I got a response within 5 minutes. All follow up responses for both those tickets were also within a few minutes. Their uptime has been rock solid and performance consistently great for the 2 years I've been with them. I dare say most projects (even moderately big ones) would do just fine without the mega cloud.
What's your definition of moderately big?
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#6As a related side note, I sent a support request to Vultr twice in the last week and both times I got a response within 5 minutes. All follow up responses for both those tickets were also within a few minutes. Their uptime has been rock solid and performance consistently great for the 2 years I've been with them. I dare say most projects (even moderately big ones) would do just fine without the mega cloud.
That's alright if EC2 is all you were using. Past a certain point though, it usually makes sense to begin using managed services like S3, BigQuery, lambda, etc.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#7As a related side note, I sent a support request to Vultr twice in the last week and both times I got a response within 5 minutes. All follow up responses for both those tickets were also within a few minutes. Their uptime has been rock solid and performance consistently great for the 2 years I've been with them. I dare say most projects (even moderately big ones) would do just fine without the mega cloud.
That's alright if EC2 is all you were using. Past a certain point though, it usually makes sense to begin using managed services like S3, BigQuery, lambda, etc.
I also use S3. I don't see why using Vultr prevents that.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#8As a related side note, I sent a support request to Vultr twice in the last week and both times I got a response within 5 minutes. All follow up responses for both those tickets were also within a few minutes. Their uptime has been rock solid and performance consistently great for the 2 years I've been with them. I dare say most projects (even moderately big ones) would do just fine without the mega cloud.
What's your definition of moderately big?
My website was on the news a couple of days ago and was doing 2200 concurrent users for a while without breaking a sweat. Cheap hardware. Server-side rendering. Multiple database calls per user to 2 different database clusters.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's your definition of moderately big?
My website was on the news a couple of days ago and was doing 2200 concurrent users for a while without breaking a sweat. Cheap hardware. Server-side rendering. Multiple database calls per user to 2 different database clusters.
That doesn't say much without knowing what the site is about.
2200 concurrent users reading a static HTML page is not the same as 2200 concurrent users trying to make a plane reservation.
Re: Trends in Cloud Computing: Who Uses AWS, Who Uses Azure
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
My website was on the news a couple of days ago and was doing 2200 concurrent users for a while without breaking a sweat. Cheap hardware. Server-side rendering. Multiple database calls per user to 2 different database clusters.
That doesn't say much without knowing what the site is about. 2200 concurrent users reading a static HTML page is not the same as 2200 concurrent users trying to make a plane reservation.
Which is exactly why I explained what I did, including mentioning server-side rendering (means not static HTML).
This is the site: https://pricehipster.com