Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
1–10 of 106 posts
Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#2Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#31k does sound quite appealing. But: most of the time a WYSIWYG editor is called is when in 'admin pages' where little to nobody gives a shit about page load time. It's more about CRUD performing as expected.
Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#4That said (and not to take thunder away from your page), this is possible because the HTML spec itself allows for any element to be made into a "WYSIWYG" editor by adding the "contenteditable" attribute.
What most other larger editors are doing is working around some of the horrendous non-standardized versions of execCommand which varies across browsers.
Ideally a web standards body should come out with a element, which is controlled through a sane API, and the spec spelled out to support everything by default. And get rid of the bane that is rich text editing on the web.
Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#5Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#6Great project.
Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#7Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#81k does sound quite appealing. But: most of the time a WYSIWYG editor is called is when in 'admin pages' where little to nobody gives a shit about page load time. It's more about CRUD performing as expected.
If it has an end user that is not yourself, I can guarantee you they do care - even if it's not a conscious realisation.
Re: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#9 Line one
Line twoRe: Pell – A simple and small rich-text editor for the web
#10Appears to fail my semantics test right off the bat. Type "Line one\nLine two" results in: Line one Line two
Firefox gives me
Line one
Line two