Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
blog.crowdspring.com
Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
#2The Buzzwords do for exposure what paparazzi do for the reach and famous.
Re: Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
#3Curious about the upvotes on this one - I found it lacking much meaningful content.
The only redeeming value was that the author arguably misused the buzzword 'paradox' in the title.
Re: Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
#4'Magical' and 'revolutionary' aren't buzzwords. Buzzwords are widely used, or even overused, and tend to imply some specific (often technical) meaning, though that meaning drifts with abuse over time. 'Open' or 'standards-based' or 'enterprise-grade security' are buzzwords.
'Magical' and 'revolutionary' are not widely used in competitive product descriptions, and don't have specific meanings -- they're intentionally vague. They're meant as, and understood as, evocative puffery.
Re: Buzzwords and the Paradox of Credibility
#5"Please allow ourselves to introduce ... ourselves"
Upvoted for the funny Austin Powers reference.