Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
sourceforge.net
Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#2Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#3Since when does anyone post things on sourceforge anymore? It makes me wonder how legitimate this is...
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#4Since when does anyone post things on sourceforge anymore? It makes me wonder how legitimate this is...
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#5That's oddly worded. The wording makes it sound like it's the code from numerous different cars in the challenge, and not just Stanford's entry, but the site wording and the source structure itself look to be a single system.
Then again, the code is from 2011, so I guess the past tense is somewhat justified...
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#6Since when does anyone post things on sourceforge anymore? It makes me wonder how legitimate this is...
I can agree with that. Even if the usernames (and real names) match members from the team, it is still a little suspicious
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#7Learn more with this paper on Junior, which uses this codebase: http://robots.stanford.edu/papers/junior08.pdf
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#8Since when does anyone post things on sourceforge anymore? It makes me wonder how legitimate this is...
Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#9Re: Stanford Code From Cars That Entered DARPA Grand Challenges
#10> Stanford Made Available Code From Cars That Entered Darpa Challenges That's oddly worded. The wording makes it sound like it's the code from numerous different cars in the challenge, and not just Stanford's entry, but the site wording and the source structure itself look to be a single system. Then again, the code is from 2011, so I guess the past tense is somewhat justified...