Live data from Hacker News

Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

scientificamerican.com

1–10 of 104 posts

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#3
To me the worse problem is: While I can understand that it is an inconvenient situation to be poor (and I have some kind of compassion for them), I really cannot understand how one could even come to the idea to give rise to children if one is not in a high quantile of earning. If people applied this reproduction strategy consequently, poverty would simply die out.

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#4
post #3

To me the worse problem is: While I can understand that it is an inconvenient situation to be poor (and I have some kind of compassion for them), I really cannot understand how one could even come to the idea to give rise to children if one is not in a high quantile of earning. If people applied this reproduction strategy consequently, poverty would simply die out.

So your solution is basically: "kill the poor".

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#6
post #4
post #3

To me the worse problem is: While I can understand that it is an inconvenient situation to be poor (and I have some kind of compassion for them), I really cannot understand how one could even come to the idea to give rise to children if one is not in a high quantile of earning. If people applied this reproduction strategy consequently, poverty would simply die out.

So your solution is basically: "kill the poor".

No, quarantine the further spread of poverty.

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#7
post #5

I've never understood using income inequality as a measure of the health of a society. As Milton Friedman said, the only place where people are equal is in a prison and in the grave. Milton Friedman on greed and income inequality: https://youtu.be/RWsx1X8PV_A

Context matters. If we're talking about a first world country, income inequality is a meaningful metric.

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#8
post #3

To me the worse problem is: While I can understand that it is an inconvenient situation to be poor (and I have some kind of compassion for them), I really cannot understand how one could even come to the idea to give rise to children if one is not in a high quantile of earning. If people applied this reproduction strategy consequently, poverty would simply die out.

jesus. Pick from: alcohol, depression, boredom, dynasty building, genetic programming.

I apologise for being rude but it sounds like you have limited compassion if you haven't been able to think this one through. What do you want to do, sterilise the poor?

I would remind you that despite a poor background children can and do still excel and even if they don't these children are often the backbone of our industry. You might not approve but these people are still the workforce and generation of tomorrow so you should afford their inception a little more respect and empathy.

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#9
post #3

To me the worse problem is: While I can understand that it is an inconvenient situation to be poor (and I have some kind of compassion for them), I really cannot understand how one could even come to the idea to give rise to children if one is not in a high quantile of earning. If people applied this reproduction strategy consequently, poverty would simply die out.

>reproduction strategy

I.e. 'stick the winkie in the hoo-hah and wiggle it around'

Re: Economic Inequality Is Worse Than We Think (2015)

#10
post #7
post #5

I've never understood using income inequality as a measure of the health of a society. As Milton Friedman said, the only place where people are equal is in a prison and in the grave. Milton Friedman on greed and income inequality: https://youtu.be/RWsx1X8PV_A

Context matters. If we're talking about a first world country, income inequality is a meaningful metric.

Because...
Post reply on HN