CockroachDB 1.0

#1

Post by hepha1979 » Wed, May 10, 2017, 1:56 PM UTC

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#2

Post by nathell » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:16 PM UTC

I read the announcement, got all excited, then clicked "What's inside CockroachDB Core?" and got rewarded with a 404. Ouch! This itches.

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#3

Post by cwisecarver » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:21 PM UTC

Cue the comments stating that no one will use this because the name is bad.

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#4

Post by Gurrewe » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:21 PM UTC

Congratulations to the team on the relase!

Everything under "The Future" really excites me, especially the geo-partitioning features. That is something that I'm really looking forward to be using!

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#5

Post by Gurrewe » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:22 PM UTC

cwisecarver wrote: post #3

Cue the comments stating that no one will use this because the name is bad.

I love their name, it clearly states what they want to achieve.

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#6

Post by dis-sys » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:22 PM UTC

I really like the fact that the CockroachDB team recently did a detailed Jepsen test with Aphyr. The follow up articles from both CockroachDB and Aphyr explaining the findings are very interesting to read. For those who might be interested -

https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/cockroachdb-beta-passes-j...

https://jepsen.io/analyses/cockroachdb-beta-20160829

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#7

Post by [deleted] » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:22 PM UTC

nathell wrote: post #2

I read the announcement, got all excited, then clicked "What's inside CockroachDB Core?" and got rewarded with a 404. Ouch! This itches.

[deleted]

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#8

Post by orangechairs » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:22 PM UTC

nathell wrote: post #2

I read the announcement, got all excited, then clicked "What's inside CockroachDB Core?" and got rewarded with a 404. Ouch! This itches.

[cockroachdb here] Yeah, we're experiencing some caching issues.

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#9

Post by jachee » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:25 PM UTC

cwisecarver wrote: post #3

Cue the comments stating that no one will use this because the name is bad.

Are you suggesting the name is a feature, not a bug?

Re: CockroachDB 1.0

#10

Post by nik736 » Wed, May 10, 2017, 2:27 PM UTC

What advantages do I have using Cockroach compared to Postgres, Cassandra, Rethink or MongoDB? (I know that all of them are completely different, that's part of the question)