A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
1–10 of 171 posts
Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#2Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#3Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#4Nothing to do with getting a better job or a better salary.
Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#5Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#6Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#7Competitive programming = coding challenges, like Google Code Jam and HackerRank. Nothing to do with getting a better job or a better salary.
Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#8https://uva.onlinejudge.org/index.php?option=com_onlinejudge...
Learning algorithms per se is only a small part of training. Much bigger part of training is learning how to recognize these algorithms in problems.
After reading about some algorithm, I always solve a couple of related problems.
P.S. Looks well-written. Bookmarked. I appreciate the effort of the author to create this book.
Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#9Competitive programming = coding challenges, like Google Code Jam and HackerRank. Nothing to do with getting a better job or a better salary.
The same skills used in competitive programming are needed to pass a modern day technical interview at some of the larger companies. So I wouldn't necessarily say it has nothing to do with getting a better job or salary.
If you're trying to argue that improving your skillset makes you more employable, sure, but that's such a general statement that I'm not sure it holds up as a retort.
Re: A Competitive Programmer's Handbook
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
The same skills used in competitive programming are needed to pass a modern day technical interview at some of the larger companies. So I wouldn't necessarily say it has nothing to do with getting a better job or salary.
In the sense of "this article has nothing to do with jobs or salaries," I would rate the claim true. The article has not one mention of either. If you're trying to argue that improving your skillset makes you more employable, sure, but that's such a general statement that I'm not sure it holds up as a retort.