Live data from Hacker News

UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unacceptable

reuters.com

1–10 of 394 posts

Re: UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unacceptable

#6
post #5

How can it be acceptable to say shit like this when you have such a position within the government.

Because we've accepted it. We know the government is watching us 24/7 and no one cares. This is the new norm.

Stories like this fill me with a slight bit of hope that encryption works

Re: UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unacceptable

#7
How do they want to prevent someone from creating his own end-to-end encryption app? It may use other protocols to encode content (images, tweets, fb posts etc.).

For me it seems to be more in a direction of so called "Big Brother" than real counter-terrorism.

Re: UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unacceptable

#8
"He sent an encrypted message from whatsapp"

Yes, and then he went and did something stupid with easily accessible tools and acted alone.

You might have an argument if he was part of a coordinated attack against something but lone-wolf terrorism has always been defined as unpreventable by security services such as SIS. Once radicalised it's impossible to prevent individuals doing stupid stuff.

The only thing she has revealed his the conservative parties desire for totalitarian control. :(

Re: UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unacceptable

#9
> "That is my view - it is completely unacceptable, there should be no place for terrorists to hide."

I am sure a ban on encryption would work.

Hey, guys, I just had a great idea. Let's ban bombs, knifes, and driving into people. That would fix the terrorism problem. Once it is illegal, no terrorist would dare do it!!!

I'm wondering why Churchill didn't think to ban the Enigma machine. If only England was led by smart people like the British interior minister...

Post reply on HN