Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
1–10 of 79 posts
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#2Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#3Good. These should be ruled unconstitutional everywhere. Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#4Why is there a need for a grace period? The yellow is all the grace period you need. If you speed up for or ignore the yellow with time to stop, you're already breaking the law...
Not that I'm a fan of the system at all - just, if you're going to do it, do it ... u know?
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#5Good. These should be ruled unconstitutional everywhere. Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#6Good. These should be ruled unconstitutional everywhere. Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Devil's advocate though : you can choose to not be affected by them by simply not running red lights. So.. while I agree on the unconstitutional part (im on your side), the other side of this, its an opt-in system, in practice
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-red-light-camera-ticke...
If you search around, there's tons of cities that were caught manipulating the timing on the cameras to increase the number of tickets.
Are you going to call the camera into court for questioning? Are they going to let a third party audit the code that runs the timers?
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#7Good. These should be ruled unconstitutional everywhere. Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Devil's advocate though : you can choose to not be affected by them by simply not running red lights. So.. while I agree on the unconstitutional part (im on your side), the other side of this, its an opt-in system, in practice
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#8While I find the camera's themselves to be... undesirable.. Why is there a need for a grace period? The yellow is all the grace period you need. If you speed up for or ignore the yellow with time to stop, you're already breaking the law... Not that I'm a fan of the system at all - just, if you're going to do it, do it ... u know?
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#9While I find the camera's themselves to be... undesirable.. Why is there a need for a grace period? The yellow is all the grace period you need. If you speed up for or ignore the yellow with time to stop, you're already breaking the law... Not that I'm a fan of the system at all - just, if you're going to do it, do it ... u know?
Re: Red-light camera grace period goes from 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, Chicago to lose $17M
#10Good. These should be ruled unconstitutional everywhere. Maybe it's just where I live but it seems like law enforcement is more focused on revenue generation.
Now I can definitely see how automated enforcement ripe for abuse when there are revenues to be had, and it's concerning when operations like this are given to private companies with little to no transparency. But given those concerns can be resolved, what's the problem at a constitutional level?