Live data from Hacker News

In Support of Free Speech

medium.com

1–10 of 119 posts

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#3
Good. I've never read a Breitbart article, but there are few things they could say that I would find more distasteful than censorship.

Interesting editorializing of the headline on this post.

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#4
I support their views on free speech, but as a matter of conscience, principle, and (more cynically) optics, they should donate all proceeds they make off of Breitbart or neo-nazi orders to civil liberties/rights organisations like the ACLU (which they mention in their post).

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#6

I support their views on free speech, but as a matter of conscience, principle, and (more cynically) optics, they should donate all proceeds they make off of Breitbart or neo-nazi orders to civil liberties/rights organisations like the ACLU (which they mention in their post).

I think this might the most reasonable stance I've read. I'm surprised the executive team didn't come up with something similar already.

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#7
If they want to prove it's about principles over profit, they could donate profits from the Breitbart account to the ACLU. Until they do that, they are allowed to work with whomever they like, but they can't take the moral high ground.

Edit: jszymborski beat me to make this comment

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#8
post #3

Good. I've never read a Breitbart article, but there are few things they could say that I would find more distasteful than censorship. Interesting editorializing of the headline on this post.

> there are few things they could say that I would find more distasteful than censorship.

Perhaps being supportive of people who have called for the extermination of black people and other minorities?

Re: In Support of Free Speech

#10

I support their views on free speech, but as a matter of conscience, principle, and (more cynically) optics, they should donate all proceeds they make off of Breitbart or neo-nazi orders to civil liberties/rights organisations like the ACLU (which they mention in their post).

Should Apple donate the profits of every Macbook sold to neo-Nazis? How do you identify them?

Don't censor people and play into their victim complex. Treat them the exact same way you would anyone else and if you can't convince them through argument that they are wrong then you have nothing to stand on.

Post reply on HN