Fukushima’s Reactor #2 is far more radioactive than previously realized
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: Fukushima’s Reactor #2 is far more radioactive than previously realized
#2This is bogus. The new, higher readings are from areas never measured before[0]; levels are falling consistently.
[0] http://blog.safecast.org/2017/02/no-radiation-levels-at-fuku...
Re: Fukushima’s Reactor #2 is far more radioactive than previously realized
#3This is bogus . The new, higher readings are from areas never measured before [0]; levels are falling consistently. [0] http://blog.safecast.org/2017/02/no-radiation-levels-at-fuku...
If you fully read the article:
>One thing I want to note at this point is these findings are being misreported across the internet as evidence Fukushima’s radiation output is “spiking” or “soaring.” This is not the case.
>The radiation levels within Reactor #2’s containment vessel have been largely unknown for years, due to the difficulty of getting proper readings from remote equipment in the first place