Live data from Hacker News

EFF's 100-Day Plan

eff.org

1–10 of 27 posts

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#3
Unlike the vast majority of end users, many HN readers have inside influence over the technology threats - even if it's just lobbying for addressing them in your company and spreading the word to others. That gives us even more responsibility than most citizens. Here are EFF's recommendations:

* Tech Companies, Fix These Technical Issues Before It’s Too Late

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/11/tech-companies-fix-the...

The U.S. (and other countries) will only be free if its citizens make it that way.

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#4
TLDR: The same as it has been.

> Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues.

> We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#5

TLDR: The same as it has been. > Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. > We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

>Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues.

I don't think they believe that. Or at least they didn't whine so much about Obama, who was horrible for digital privacy. And Hillary would've continued that legacy, but of course they didn't whine about that either.

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#6
post #5

TLDR: The same as it has been. > Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. > We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

>Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. I don't think they believe that. Or at least they didn't whine so much about Obama, who was horrible for digital privacy. And Hillary would've continued that legacy, but of course they didn't whine about that either.

[deleted]

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#7
post #5

TLDR: The same as it has been. > Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. > We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

>Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. I don't think they believe that. Or at least they didn't whine so much about Obama, who was horrible for digital privacy. And Hillary would've continued that legacy, but of course they didn't whine about that either.

[deleted]

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#8
post #5

TLDR: The same as it has been. > Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. > We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

>Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. I don't think they believe that. Or at least they didn't whine so much about Obama, who was horrible for digital privacy. And Hillary would've continued that legacy, but of course they didn't whine about that either.

This is nonsense. The EFF has been extremely critical of the Obama administration - especially in the wake of the Snowden revelations.

Re: EFF's 100-Day Plan

#9
post #5

TLDR: The same as it has been. > Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. > We’ve seen digital rights come under threat no matter which party controls the Oval Office.

>Make no mistake: privacy, liberty, and accountability are not partisan issues. I don't think they believe that. Or at least they didn't whine so much about Obama, who was horrible for digital privacy. And Hillary would've continued that legacy, but of course they didn't whine about that either.

It's never seem that way to me [1].

[1] https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Aeff.org%2...

Post reply on HN