Live data from Hacker News

2017 is not just another prime number

weijr-note.blogspot.com

1–10 of 63 posts

Re: 2017 is not just another prime number

#5

What I always wonder though, is 2017 really a special number or can you fit things like this to every number?

What I like to do to measure the "mathematical interestingness" of a number, is check how many times it appears in OEIS. A database of sequences of numbers found in mathematical research. 2017 appeared in 453 sequences. For comparison; 2016 appears 833 sequences, and 2018 appears in 113.

http://oeis.org/search?q=seq%3A2016&sort=&language=english&g...

Re: 2017 is not just another prime number

#6

What I always wonder though, is 2017 really a special number or can you fit things like this to every number?

What I like to do to measure the "mathematical interestingness" of a number, is check how many times it appears in OEIS. A database of sequences of numbers found in mathematical research. 2017 appeared in 453 sequences. For comparison; 2016 appears 833 sequences, and 2018 appears in 113. http://oeis.org/search?q=seq%3A2016&sort=&language=english&g...

Every number is special.

Proof is by contradiction: Assume that not every number is mathematically interesting and let X be the first such number. However, the fact that X is the lowest such number is itself pretty special, right?

Re: 2017 is not just another prime number

#7

What I always wonder though, is 2017 really a special number or can you fit things like this to every number?

Reminds me of "Interesting number paradox" :p This can be considered as a proof that every number is interesting.

IMHO, being a prime number might give 2017 some advantages, and 2017 might be a slightly more interesting than most of prime numbers.

Re: 2017 is not just another prime number

#8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I like to do to measure the "mathematical interestingness" of a number, is check how many times it appears in OEIS. A database of sequences of numbers found in mathematical research. 2017 appeared in 453 sequences. For comparison; 2016 appears 833 sequences, and 2018 appears in 113. http://oeis.org/search?q=seq%3A2016&sort=&language=english&g...

Every number is special. Proof is by contradiction: Assume that not every number is mathematically interesting and let X be the first such number. However, the fact that X is the lowest such number is itself pretty special, right?

Can this proof be adapted for the reals, or is it only the case that every integer is special?

Re: 2017 is not just another prime number

#10
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I like to do to measure the "mathematical interestingness" of a number, is check how many times it appears in OEIS. A database of sequences of numbers found in mathematical research. 2017 appeared in 453 sequences. For comparison; 2016 appears 833 sequences, and 2018 appears in 113. http://oeis.org/search?q=seq%3A2016&sort=&language=english&g...

Every number is special. Proof is by contradiction: Assume that not every number is mathematically interesting and let X be the first such number. However, the fact that X is the lowest such number is itself pretty special, right?

Proved only for non-negative numbers! :)
Post reply on HN