Our attempt to disrupt messaging
medium.com
Our attempt to disrupt messaging
1–3 of 3 posts
Re: Our attempt to disrupt messaging
#2From their privacy policy: "We cannot decrypt or otherwise access the content of a message.
We also can not decrypt what physical person actually send or received a message."
Well, that's great to hear, but as always: These are just words on a page, how can I know it's true? Where's your code? Where's your security audit? Who's the team?
I really like the idea, and believe if done right it actually can do some so-called disruption, but I think in this market a real disruption will only come if you manage to decentralize (at least so I don't need to trust your servers to be up for me to get my messages) and open source it, but still cater to the masses.
You're running a freemium business model, a model which works well (some ways even better) also with open source code.
Re: Our attempt to disrupt messaging
#3From their privacy policy: "We cannot decrypt or otherwise access the content of a message. We also can not decrypt what physical person actually send or received a message." Well, that's great to hear, but as always: These are just words on a page, how can I know it's true? Where's your code? Where's your security audit? Who's the team? I really like the idea, and believe if done right it actually can do some so-cal…
Well we guess, when it comes to small companies that are trying to make their way people are more demanding ? Do you ask WhatsApp and co source code ? We have absolut no interest in user data. Thats why you can use Dikalo without even signing up. The messages never reach our servers in clear and we dont even save users emails in clear. We will have security audits. For sure. We are just getting started. Just give us a try :)