USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
stat.columbia.edu
USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
#2Re: USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
#3I have a hunch that it will be similar, but it would be interesting to see where the anomalies are.
Re: USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
#4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USA_states_population_den...
The fact that WalMart originated in Arkansas skews the numbers for the south, but for the rest of the country there is a clear correlation between population density and stores per capita. Notice how California (12), Illinois (11), Ohio(9), all have lower per capita WalMarts than North Dakota (47), South Dakota (46), Montana (48), Wyoming (49).
The numbers in parentheses represents the state's place in terms of population density.
Re: USA state-by-state per-capita Walmart vs. Starbucks
#5This map makes me sad. I live in western Oklahoma, where the Starbucks to Walmart ratio heavy favors cheap plastic crap over delicious trendy lattes. Someone gave me a gift card for Starbucks for Christmas and I haven't even gotten to use it yet because there aren't any for a 100 miles, but there's a crappy Walmart on every corner.
I was meeting my dad in NYC, waiting for him in a Starbucks, gave him the corner it was on. He went to the Starbucks 1 block over. After waiting for me a while, he asked an employee if there were any other Starbuckses nearby, and got a whole list. See also the Simpsons [http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3G04].