https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1556458/000120919116148881/xslF345X01/doc4.xml
Couldn't he just buy them back at lower value?
1–10 of 14 posts
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1556458/000120919116148881/xslF345X01/doc4.xml
Couldn't he just buy them back at lower value?
He sent an internal email about politics and it backfired. It's not like he gave a press conference announcing the company was in financial trouble.
Whatever you're reaching for here, it's quite a reach. He sent an internal email about politics and it backfired. It's not like he gave a press conference announcing the company was in financial trouble.
Whatever you're reaching for here, it's quite a reach. He sent an internal email about politics and it backfired. It's not like he gave a press conference announcing the company was in financial trouble.
It was the day before. Your point about it being an email is exactly my point this could be taken as him knowing something that nobody else did and thus selling his shares. Just looks odd
If he anticipated it would leak and tank the stock wouldn't he have more likely just run it by some folks and sent something less poorly worded?
Whatever you're reaching for here, it's quite a reach. He sent an internal email about politics and it backfired. It's not like he gave a press conference announcing the company was in financial trouble.
a lot of tech stocks took a beating today[1]. the stock sale, price and email are pretty unrelated
[1] http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tech-stocks-plunge-for-seco...