Ring, officially a GNU package
blog.savoirfairelinux.com
Ring, officially a GNU package
1–10 of 68 posts
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#2Official web page seems to be https://ring.cx/
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#3Has ring improved much? I remember a few months back it used 28gb of background data over LTE (which was fine since I'm uncapped) on my phone, and was less stable than sflphone, which would randomly stop registering occasionally.
I can recommend pjsip though, very reliable so long as you read its docs before writing a script to leverage it.
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#4Official web page seems to be https://ring.cx/
And https://ring.cx/en/about/practical contains more details about the project.
Source repositories located at https://gerrit-ring.savoirfairelinux.com/#/admin/projects/ (Uses gerrit!)
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#5This appears to be something phone-related, not the Ring cryptography library written in Rust based on Boringssl. (https://github.com/briansmith/ring)
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#6What stops attackers from poisoning the DHT? Could one publish false name IP address associations?
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#7This appears to be something phone-related, not the Ring cryptography library written in Rust based on Boringssl. ( https://github.com/briansmith/ring )
Neither is it the Clojure web server library https://github.com/ring-clojure/ring.
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#8There seems to be no browseable source code around, what are the implementation language(s)? I want to know whether the protocol implementations are written in a memory-safe language.
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#9There seems to be no browseable source code around, what are the implementation language(s)? I want to know whether the protocol implementations are written in a memory-safe language.
check Contribute > Build instructions
Re: Ring, officially a GNU package
#10The DHT system for identities is cool, but the thing that gets me is that they don't have support for SRTP with ZRTP, only SRTP with SDES. There's no perfect forward secrecy, and a bunch of other features that ZRTP has.
https://www.silentcircle.com/products-and-solutions/technolo...