How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
pugs.blogs.com
How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#2I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010...
Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#3Hi. Thanks for the link! I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010... Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Anyway, both of them are such a mix of incoherent rambling and impenetrable project internals that I feel cheated for the time it took to skim over them...
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#4Hi. Thanks for the link! I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010... Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Not sure what original you are referring to, but the one linked to is in fact titled "How to implement Perl 6 in ten years". Anyway, both of them are such a mix of incoherent rambling and impenetrable project internals that I feel cheated for the time it took to skim over them...
Software is hard, let's go shopping.
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#5Hi. Thanks for the link! I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010... Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Not sure what original you are referring to, but the one linked to is in fact titled "How to implement Perl 6 in ten years". Anyway, both of them are such a mix of incoherent rambling and impenetrable project internals that I feel cheated for the time it took to skim over them...
I was referring to the "..." tag in the linked article at http://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2010/04/how-to-implement-perl-6-i... as the title of the blog entry.
I'm truly sorry that you feel cheated. Indeed the article contains nothing about implementing anything in 10 minutes, or anything of that sort. My apologies... :-)
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#6Hi. Thanks for the link! I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010... Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Updated, thanks for the correction audrey.
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#7Hi. Thanks for the link! I'm sure you noticed, the original title was "How to implement Perl 6 in '10", where '10 was meant to refer to the year 2010... Though I guess "10 minutes" is a valid, if unexpected, interpretation of "'10". Enjoy! :-)
Not sure what original you are referring to, but the one linked to is in fact titled "How to implement Perl 6 in ten years". Anyway, both of them are such a mix of incoherent rambling and impenetrable project internals that I feel cheated for the time it took to skim over them...
Its a subset of Perl6 which (according to the github page at http://github.com/fglock/Perlito) compiles to:
* Perl5
* Java
* Javascript
* Lisp (SBCL)
* Parrot
* Go
Sounds interesting!An online Javascript compiler can be found here: http://www.perlito.org/js/
Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#8Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#9Re: How to implement Perl 6 in 2010
#10Coming from the python community, I have to wonder how much exchanges like this have contributed to the delay: http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=835742
Troll alchemy - I mean troll hugging - is a subtle art, and it took us many years to get the main development channels into reasonable civility.
For example, http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/today has been quite gentle for the past 5 years or so.
I guess when one builds a language (Perl) modeled after a natural language (English), one attracts quite a diverse crowd, as basic literacy was the only requirement...
Compare that to Haskell, modeled after mathematics, which attracts folks who thinks in higher-order logic... And as you could imagine, exchanges like the one you cited was quite difficult to express in equations.
On the other hand, civilized exchanges like we see in ycombinator.com is quite difficult to express in equations, too... :-)