Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
nytimes.com
Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
1–10 of 118 posts
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#2Long story short: quality is always important. as the median age of user rises, quality requirements increase dramatically.
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#3Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#4> In 2014, Belichick noted that the system had crashed, but seemed mostly cool with it. “I’d say that’s all kind of part of the game,” he said.
> “I just can’t take it anymore,” he said at a news conference Tuesday.
This is an under-reported challenge of the increasing automation narrative: we need more robust systems.
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#5Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#6I think there is a lot to be said about the fact that any event that has as much tech as an NFL broadcast and that it is never setup permanently will always run into some issue. The base complaint seems to be just that the league gives him the stuff too late to work out any unforeseen issues, and so it just is a sprint to troubleshoot week after week where he could just show up with briefcase full of printed plays and this just not be a problem. It's not like he has a shortage of bodies for manual labour on the sidelines.
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#7> Microsoft entered into a long-term sponsorship partnership with the league in 2013. At the time, the N.F.L. had a list of demands for the equipment, including ruggedness, ease of use, size, effectiveness in extreme temperature and glare resistance. > In 2014, Belichick noted that the system had crashed, but seemed mostly cool with it. “I’d say that’s all kind of part of the game,” he said. > “I just can’t take it a…
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#8Not sure this really says anything bad about Microsoft. Is it really hard to imagine an NFL coach losing his temper with something let alone a computer?
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#9This speaks to a higher level perception about software. Bugs and crashes, however inconsistent, irreparably damage the sentiment about using a technology. Younger folks grew up in an age with these inconsistencies and are less perturbed by them. To older folks though, manual systems rarely "fail" during use. The bar of acceptance is a great deal higher when your reliability and availability are compared to pencil an…
Sometimes I don't need to remember everything I've drawn on a whiteboard. And what's more, if I'm using a smart board that reboots in the middle of brainstorming, I'm thrown majorly off my groove and it may take a long time to recover my train of thought after troubleshooting.
So the complexity affords tremendous flexibility, but unavoidably at the cost of reliability.
Re: Bill Belichick Throws in the Tablet
#10That's ridiculous, unless the NFL is also providing all the technical support (which Bill's actual rant doesn't imply they do.) Having just a short time to use, test and get them ready for the game is incredibly lousy, and certainly won't give the team's IT people any chance to seriously troubleshoot and improve the situation.
It doesn't matter who makes the tech, or how solid it is. You can't just throw tech at a problem and expect it to solve it.