Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
news.nationalgeographic.com
Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#2Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#3Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#4you're all idiots.
Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#5What does it mean by saying "our section of the Milky Way galaxy"? If the section is somehow larger, does that mean that the Milky Way galaxy is also larger?
Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#6What does it mean by saying "our section of the Milky Way galaxy"? If the section is somehow larger, does that mean that the Milky Way galaxy is also larger?
Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#7Re: Our Part of the Milky Way Is Bigger Than Previously Thought
#8What does it mean by saying "our section of the Milky Way galaxy"? If the section is somehow larger, does that mean that the Milky Way galaxy is also larger?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Artist%27s_impression_of_...
The Earth is on that little strip at the bottom center of that picture, which looks like it's crossing between two of the larger arms.
Because the galaxy is disc-like and Earth is located about halfway between the center of the disc and it's edge, we're not in a great place to get a good perspective of how the galaxy actually looks. We basically watch stuff spin around us and try to estimate what it looks like from a top-down view.
The study concludes that parts of what we previously attributed to other arms actually belong to the arm that Earth is located on, making the arm longer than previously estimated.