Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#2Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#3SMS traffic grew rapidly as well, but it did not take away the voice business.
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#4Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#5I don't buy it. Either he's focused on only one segment of the internet population (individuals, not businesses), or it's more wishful thinking regarding social networking.
Just what, exactly, is deemed so terrible about email? Shouldn't this be analyzed via mass correspondence vs. individual-to-individual? I think the author is greatly overgeneralizing, and thus drawing misleading conclusions.
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#6Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#7This post doesn't make sense. It's comparing email to social networking all as time spent communicating. It doesn't classify that time though, is time spent reading emails really the same as any time I spend on social networking sites? How many hours of farmville equals one hour of emailing?
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#8If you have to have an email address to sign up to most if not all social networks, how is the sign-up figure correct?
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#9The Gotham Gal looked at me and said "why are you checking twitter and not email?" ... I told her that email required a reply and twitter did not.
Re: Fred Wilson on Social Networking vs Email
#10Lately, I've been taking notes on this. These are not bad observations:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1223346 - Networking advices from legendary Silicon Valley networker, Heidi Roizen - 90% of my interactions are on email (and I will say that is the same for almost all highly efficient people I know)
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1248503 - Ron Conway Explained - (quoted email) “AM ON IT.”
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/03/28/Compartmen... - Communication Silos - They differ in their latency, reach, and persistence and, on another axis, in length of form.