Live data from Hacker News

First 'three person baby' born using new method

bbc.co.uk

1–10 of 189 posts

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#2
Sounds like mother & father's nuclear DNA, injected into the nucleus of a 3rd party's donor's egg cell, which contains its own mitochondrial DNA. Since mtDNA is normally inherited 100% from the mother (since the mother's egg cell supplies the mitochondria to the embryo), if the mother has a mitochondrial genetic disease, 100% of her children would normally inherit it.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#5
post #4

so science fiction of Alien Nation in a ways. so can they simply stock pile good genes and swap them out as necessary in the near future?

That strays into the eugenics region. Not there yet; the moral and legal 'obstacles' will be present for a long while.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#7
mtDNA is also very significant in historical migration studies... if anyone has a high level explanation of the global state of knowledge in this area I would love to see it ... trying to author a regionally focused ancient history book and piecing together the disparate pieces of supposed genetic evidence for various things is a task I am wholly unqualified for and would love some assistance with.

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#9

mtDNA is also very significant in historical migration studies... if anyone has a high level explanation of the global state of knowledge in this area I would love to see it ... trying to author a regionally focused ancient history book and piecing together the disparate pieces of supposed genetic evidence for various things is a task I am wholly unqualified for and would love some assistance with.

This book did a great job, but it might be outdated:

https://www.amazon.com/Power-Sex-Suicide-Mitochondria-Meanin...

Re: First 'three person baby' born using new method

#10
post #5
post #4

so science fiction of Alien Nation in a ways. so can they simply stock pile good genes and swap them out as necessary in the near future?

That strays into the eugenics region. Not there yet; the moral and legal 'obstacles' will be present for a long while.

I've never heard Eugenics defined in this way. I've only heard it used to mean selective planned breeding (as we do with livestock), but not intentional selective improvement of the parents' DNA.
Post reply on HN