ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
gate.d5.mpi-inf.mpg.de
ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
#2Re: ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
#3Paper at https://people.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~rgemulla/publications/delcorr...
Clausie homepage: https://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-informa...
Re: ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
#4A while ago, I tested Stanford's Core NLP Open IE implementation and UW (now AllenAII)'s version[1]. The UW version was much better.
The paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it.
Re: ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
#5A while ago, I tested Stanford's Core NLP Open IE implementation and UW (now AllenAII)'s version[1]. The UW version was much better. The paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it. [1] https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone
I found a Stanford Parser jar file in the sources of ClauseIE.
Re: ClausIE: Clause-Based Open Information Extraction
#6A while ago, I tested Stanford's Core NLP Open IE implementation and UW (now AllenAII)'s version[1]. The UW version was much better. The paper for this make it look pretty good compared to that. I'll be trying it. [1] https://github.com/allenai/openie-standalone
I came to the same conclusion. OTOH OpenIE is around 4x slower than CoreNLP and the memory requirements can also be a problem (~4GB JVM heap space).
I would be really interested on how ClausIE stacks up to that.
ClausIE also seems to be using CoreNLP _and_ OpenNLP.