Live data from Hacker News

Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary? [video]

youtube.com

1–10 of 34 posts

Re: Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary? [video]

#4
When I was following the primaries, I preferred Bing's tool to Google's here(just search "primaries" from a US location in either tool). The Google one seemed overly simplistic, especially earlier when there were more potential delegates.

I still tend to search with Google, but Bing at least seems to give a more 'unfiltered' view of your query. Google seems to have a lot more heuristics tweaking things in the background, so I use them for my first search and switch to Bing if I need to see everything for some oddly specific query.

Re: Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary? [video]

#5
Who knows, maybe they got cleared because someone was trolling the suggestion engine, just because there is heavy logical correlation that suggest higher rated search terms should be suggested, that doesn't mean there are not other factors that outweigh it. We don't really know how it works.

I am not being defensive of them, in fact it wouldn't surprise me if it was true, just that they got caught. It is actually pretty fascinating and scary how entangled the Google universe and the Government are, and right or wrong, they are seem to be more invested in their vision of the future more than financial* gains.

* but money is always a little bit a part of it

Re: Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary? [video]

#7
I also don't see electoral fraud and exit poll discrepancies talked about as much anymore:

https://medium.com/@spencergundert/hillary-clinton-and-elect...

An interesting read from April which continues to be relevant and attributable to last Tuesday's primaries as well.

Re: Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary? [video]

#10
Its hard to believe Google would do that. There is so much risk of being exposed. As an alternate hypothetical - A Google engineer who has knowledge of their internal systems could suggest a means of external manipulation, that would accomplish the same goal, without the risk.
Post reply on HN