Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
1–10 of 163 posts
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#2Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#3Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#4Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#5Paywall
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#6The article states that they studied rats and mice at 9 hrs/day exposure (at what RF power?) but aren't reporting results for mice at this stage.
Of the rats (how many?), they found the "cancer association appeared in male rats" but no effect size or confidence interval is reported. No mention of dose sensitivity is mentioned.
So they report some cancer association (how much? we don't know. how confident? we don't know) in a small subset of their study population (excluding female rats and all mice) at some unknown RF power and at an exposure time considerably larger than what most humans would receive.
I'm sure the science behind the study is much more rigorous than this, but wow - the reporting sucks.
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#7Eck, worth mentioning that science is done by consensus. Individual studies might be interesting, but it means nothing until it's shown in the context of an aggregated review.
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#8And then, if phones are causing cancer? Do you think everyone will stop using them? Do you think Apple will go bankrupt?
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#9Also modern phones transmit at the bottom of the device. Lastly radio power is much lower now due to much smaller cells.
Re: Cellphone-Cancer Link Found in Government Study
#10Does anyone have a link to the actual paper? As usual, it's impossible to get any useful information from a sensational mainstream science article. The article states that they studied rats and mice at 9 hrs/day exposure (at what RF power?) but aren't reporting results for mice at this stage. Of the rats (how many?), they found the "cancer association appeared in male rats" but no effect size or confidence interval i…
Abstract: http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699
Direct PDF link: http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/05/26/055699.f...