Live data from Hacker News

Worst Apple products

pcauthority.com.au

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Worst Apple products

#3
> OK, we can all have a giggle at 'portable' computers from the early days of computing but at nearly 16 pounds the Mac Portable really was taking the piss.

My first computer-of-my-very-own was my beloved Compaq Deskpro Portable (autoexec.bat ftw). It weighed in at just under 30 lbs.

Edit: I still have it some 25 years later, and it still works.

Re: Worst Apple products

#5

> OK, we can all have a giggle at 'portable' computers from the early days of computing but at nearly 16 pounds the Mac Portable really was taking the piss. My first computer-of-my-very-own was my beloved Compaq Deskpro Portable (autoexec.bat ftw). It weighed in at just under 30 lbs. Edit: I still have it some 25 years later, and it still works.

In my first job I had a portable III http://oldcomputers.net/compaqiii.html - considerably lighter at a mere 20lbs!

It was great - when there wasn't a seat on the train or at the station I could sit on it.

Re: Worst Apple products

#7
OK, that is a pretty bad article, showing how little about Apple the writers know.

They only touched tangentially on the Performa line; what made the Performa so horrendous, was that certain models were actually slower than the models they replaced. For example, the Performa 5200 had a crippled IDE bus, and the motherboard was based on a Quadra 605 board, giving the 75Mhz PPC 603 chip less performance than a PPC601 running at 88Mhz. See http://lowendmac.com/ppc/performa-5200.html

Re: Worst Apple products

#8

OK, that is a pretty bad article, showing how little about Apple the writers know. They only touched tangentially on the Performa line; what made the Performa so horrendous, was that certain models were actually slower than the models they replaced. For example, the Performa 5200 had a crippled IDE bus, and the motherboard was based on a Quadra 605 board, giving the 75Mhz PPC 603 chip less performance than a PPC601 r…

Wow. This hadn't occurred to me before, but it also goes to show you how bad they were at naming. I mean, "Performa"? If that doesn't scream "budget line", I don't know what does.

Re: Worst Apple products

#10
post #4

Wow. How could they forget the AppleTV?

Is the Apple TV a particularly bad product? It seems to remain a profitable hobby, whereas most of these were lambasted from the start, and fairly short-lived.
Post reply on HN