Who Needs Apple When the FBI Could Hack Terrorist iPhone Itself
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Who Needs Apple When the FBI Could Hack Terrorist iPhone Itself
#2They don't even need a brute force attack. If decryption works without a SIM card, then the key is on the device, protected by a code with a mere 10,000 possibilities. For the FBI, isn't that child's play?
Re: Who Needs Apple When the FBI Could Hack Terrorist iPhone Itself
#3I was taught that the first principle of security is physical security. Once your attacker has possession of your hardware, decrypting the data is only a matter of time. They don't even need a brute force attack. If decryption works without a SIM card, then the key is on the device, protected by a code with a mere 10,000 possibilities. For the FBI, isn't that child's play?
Though this should be ineffective for the secure enclave where additional fuse bits are set unique to a device that add more entropy and black box key derivation to the whole thing
Re: Who Needs Apple When the FBI Could Hack Terrorist iPhone Itself
#4I was taught that the first principle of security is physical security. Once your attacker has possession of your hardware, decrypting the data is only a matter of time. They don't even need a brute force attack. If decryption works without a SIM card, then the key is on the device, protected by a code with a mere 10,000 possibilities. For the FBI, isn't that child's play?