Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#2Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#3This means I can test all the Javascript that my rails applications use without opening a browser!
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#4It's more common than you think.
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#5Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#6This means I can test all the Javascript that my rails applications use without opening a browser!
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#7I can see how this could be extremely useful, but it does strike me as yet another source for unique bugs in your JS-manipulating-DOM code, and it's potentially even harder to find out why they're happening.
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#8So, which browser's quirks does this emulate? And what version of HTML does it support? (seriously. and what user agent does it report? developing cross-browser code is often important) I can see how this could be extremely useful, but it does strike me as yet another source for unique bugs in your JS-manipulating-DOM code, and it's potentially even harder to find out why they're happening.
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#9This means I can test all the Javascript that my rails applications use without opening a browser!
You can run cucumber + selenium. I'm pretty sure selenium can run in headless mode (haven't turned it on yet, too fun to watch!)
I'll continue to periodically run my tests inside a "real" browser, but I think this sort of headless testing is a real win.
[Disclaimer: I wrote Johnson, so I'm not exactly a disinterested bystander. Edited for repetition.]
Re: Javascript + DOM in your ruby, the simple way
#10So, which browser's quirks does this emulate? And what version of HTML does it support? (seriously. and what user agent does it report? developing cross-browser code is often important) I can see how this could be extremely useful, but it does strike me as yet another source for unique bugs in your JS-manipulating-DOM code, and it's potentially even harder to find out why they're happening.
The user agent it reports as is irrelevant - it's not a full http client. You can use other ruby tools to fetch a page if you want, and then feed harmony the document.
As others pointed out, testing is probably the main use case, but it offers other obvious possibilities; for instance, talkerapp.com needed a way to easily validate js syntax for their plugins.