Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
home.cc.gatech.edu
Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#2No syntax highlighting? Windows XP? Really?
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#3Few Jeroo commands:
>hop(n): When n is an integer greater than 0, this moves the Jeroo n spaces forward.
>pick(): Picks a flower from the Jeroo's location.
>plant(): Plants a flower at the Jeroo's location.
>turn(): This can turn the Jeroo left or right.
>toss(): This makes the Jeroo toss a flower to the space in front of it, disabling a net.
From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeroo
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#4The site says last modified in 2008... Might want to add (2008) to the title.
It looks like a cool concept! It seems like a slightly more "code focused" Scratch.
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#5The site says last modified in 2008... Might want to add (2008) to the title. It looks like a cool concept! It seems like a slightly more "code focused" Scratch.
Yes very interesting. A more Logo-like approach.
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#6Wtf... What year are we in?
Did you post this as a joke?
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#7The site says last modified in 2008... Might want to add (2008) to the title. It looks like a cool concept! It seems like a slightly more "code focused" Scratch.
Ok, we added the year.
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#8Wtf... What year are we in? Did you post this as a joke?
Historical posts are always welcome on Hacker News. Snarky, dismissive comment are not. Please don't post any more of those.
Re: Jeroo: educational IDE for novice programmers (2008)
#9Wtf... What year are we in? Did you post this as a joke?
Historical posts are always welcome on Hacker News. Snarky, dismissive comment are not. Please don't post any more of those.
Fine. But when I commented it was not clear that it was a historical post; and the value of the post - and intentions of the poster - are still not clear.