How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
1–10 of 390 posts
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#2I do pay subscriptions for things that I use (almost) daily: Hulu no commercials version, Netflix, and Google Music.
So, good idea, but I would expect a subscription to perhaps cost $10 to $15/year. Just my opinion...
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#3I like the idea of paying for subscriptions for no-ad service. However, the $1/week seems a little high. I might read 10 to 20 articles a year on wired.com. I do pay subscriptions for things that I use (almost) daily: Hulu no commercials version, Netflix, and Google Music. So, good idea, but I would expect a subscription to perhaps cost $10 to $15/year. Just my opinion...
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#4Good luck with that, Wired.
The people-who-will-never-pay group will split into two: People who never visit your site again, and people who up the ante in the ad-blocking escalation.
While you may think that you don't care about the people-who-will-never-pay group, the latter subgroup will release their improved ad-blocker, allowing the people-who-might-have-paid group to continue blocking ads.
I don't see this ending well for any party involved.
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#5You can't trust the client. Ads are displayed in the client. It would take hardware level ad serving to make ad serving and anti-ad blocking feasible.
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#6Isn't having an account a form of tracking?
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#7well, i will restrict my viewing of WIRED.com then. Like completely.
Re: How Wired Is Going to Handle Ad Blocking
#8If you feel $1 per week ($50 / year) is too much remember that display ads to a targeted audience such as Wired's are worth CPM rates that you'd probably not believe.
Tracking (oh, you thought this was about advertising?) you has value, and quite a bit of it.
This ad-blocker wall thing is an interesting development (and Wired is definitely not the first site doing this), I sincerely hope that wired will survive the transition, at the same time they don't seem to understand that to lay fundamental blame for using an adblocker with that 20% of their audience (that high?). After all, it wasn't the users that decided to substitute 'ads' with 'tracking', 'visual garbage' and 'malware' it was the properties and the advertising companies that did that and wired does not seem to want to do much to prevent the remaining 80% or so from also installing an adblocker.
But ads without profiling are so much less lucrative that wired has now made 'advertising on or else pay us at a rate that reflects our rate card' into their opening bid in an all-out confrontation with their users.
Interesting times. If this holds for a while we might have our non-commercial web back. Note that nowhere does wired say that if you do disable your adblocker that you won't be profiled or tracked by them or their advertisers or analytics providers, privacybadger spots 8 of these on that very page.
I've seen enough of the inner workings of ad tech companies to never want to disable all my ad blockers, we'll see if there is a wired article that pushes me across the line to a paying subscriber. This one would not have made the cut.
Someone please invent an actual working micropayments system that does not rely on a centralized entity.