Flash-Free Video in 2016
open.blogs.nytimes.com
Flash-Free Video in 2016
1–10 of 203 posts
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#2So, basically Flash lives on because advertisers are still looking for a way to track us without our permission.
Gee thanks.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#3So, basically Flash lives on because advertisers are still looking for a way to track us without our permission. Gee thanks.
All closed technology, on some level, exists to perpetuate coercion. This is the thesis of the free software movement.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#4Sometimes I think Steve Jobs' greatest contribution may have been killing flash. Today is a glorious day.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#5If they still serve video via Brightcove, seems like a big win for the Zencoder acquisition, which included the video.js player. I do see video.js in the source.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#6So, basically Flash lives on because advertisers are still looking for a way to track us without our permission. Gee thanks.
They don't need Flash to track us. Google does it just fine without it.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#7This is excellent, and sounds like the result of hard work and harder cajoling of the ad-men. Thanks, NYT, for doing your part.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#8"VHS"
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#9Perhaps a little off-topic but it would be nice if NPR could HTML5-up their web radio player also.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#10Fantastic news and congrats to the NY Times team.
Does anyone know, who at this point still continues to use Flash?