Live data from Hacker News

An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

github.com

1–10 of 113 posts

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#3
The controversy isn't black-and-white and I'm not sure why this letter is painting it that way. GitHub can be a major boon to open source and have core issues which make it incredibly frustrating to work with the service.

The dilemma is about the sum of the parts.

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#4
I assume this is a response to the "Dear Github" letter. I'm fairly certain that everyone involved in that letter (including myself), is very appreciative of Github and its impact on OSS. That letter didn't feel ungrateful or malicious at all to me, but I sure hope it didn't come off that way to others.

What I do frequently see with Github, is that they've managed to work their way into almost being beyond reproach. This letter feels like an example of that...Almost like Github needs someone to stand up for it in light of some meanies picking on it.

It's a good product. We should give credit where credit is due, just don't forget it's a product. A (by all indications), very profitable product that wants to make money off you. That is its goal and purpose in life, and OSS furthers it. For the record, I think this is a good and healthy relationship, but we shouldn't pretend it's some FOSS group or non-profit out struggling to provide us with Git hosting.

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#5
Github makes millions of dollars per year and has a huge amount of users so the product is proven good. While I understand the need to be appreciative of Github, giving the organization a bit of user feedback is not going to hurt them very much. The response assumes that this is written because of the "Dear Github" letter.

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#6

The controversy isn't black-and-white and I'm not sure why this letter is painting it that way. GitHub can be a major boon to open source and have core issues which make it incredibly frustrating to work with the service. The dilemma is about the sum of the parts .

Completely agree, also this post makes it appear like GH did all it has done out of the goodness of their heart... Sure it's great what they did for OS but to pretend that wasn't rooted in making money is just ignorant.

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#7

Github makes millions of dollars per year and has a huge amount of users so the product is proven good. While I understand the need to be appreciative of Github, giving the organization a bit of user feedback is not going to hurt them very much. The response assumes that this is written because of the "Dear Github" letter.

Constructive feedback is fine, but "I have told you, you know that, but you are ignoring me, what's wrong" is a different story. My reaction to that is 1) it shows you already sent the feedback, what you want is to complain in public, and 2) I own you no shit.

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#8
Before 2007, the way to participate in Open Source was fragmented. Each project had their own workflow, patches circulated in emails, issues were reported in a myriad ways, and if anyone wanted to contribute they had to figure out every project's rules.

Then, a handful of guys took the challenge to build an awesome platform and as a consequence of their hard work, their platform earned its hegemony.

Two things stand out in this "thank you Github" open letter:

1. While the situation improved tremendously in certain areas the way to participate in Open Source is still very much fragmented. Most of the major open source projects (like Linux, Mozilla, Apache and nginx, to name a few) still have their own workflows, patches are still circulated in emails and issues are still being reported in a myriad ways. Despite of the big visibility GitHub has among the new open source projects we are very far from not being fragmented.

2. Before 2007 we had, for instance, SourceForge that back then had also earned its hegemony and, for a series of reasons (one of them being too late to answer to the community wants and needs) lost its way, its hegemony and its user base.

There is time for praise and time for hard work and, IMO, the "Dear Github" open letter is a constructive way to call attention to the perceived problems while the 'Dear "Dear Github"' and this gratitude letter are dismissive to their concerns (the former) and mostly empty praise and adulation (the later).

Re: An open letter of gratitude to GitHub

#10

The controversy isn't black-and-white and I'm not sure why this letter is painting it that way. GitHub can be a major boon to open source and have core issues which make it incredibly frustrating to work with the service. The dilemma is about the sum of the parts .

Completely agree, also this post makes it appear like GH did all it has done out of the goodness of their heart... Sure it's great what they did for OS but to pretend that wasn't rooted in making money is just ignorant.

The post is assuming nothing about the motivations, which anyone but founders can't but at most conjecture.
Post reply on HN