A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

wildpeaks wrote: post #2

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D). Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

Yeah, I don't understand the point of Mozilla making their own flavor of this, rather than contributing to X3D. Or hell, any of the several other open source projects of a similar nature.

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#5

Post by polskibus » Thu, Dec 17, 2015, 1:59 PM UTC

Interesting, as others mentioned X3D similarity is obvious.

I wonder how would A-Frame compose with D3.js though .

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#6

Post by sebg » Thu, Dec 17, 2015, 2:40 PM UTC

polskibus wrote: post #5

Interesting, as others mentioned X3D similarity is obvious. I wonder how would A-Frame compose with D3.js though .

Since A-Frame mentions this => "A-Frame is ultimately just the DOM, so developers can also manipulate it with standard JavaScript methods,"... it means D3.js should work beautifully with it (as should other frameworks that do data DOM binding/manipulation)

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#7

Post by mattdesl » Thu, Dec 17, 2015, 2:55 PM UTC

moron4hire wrote: post #4

wildpeaks wrote: post #2

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D). Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

Yeah, I don't understand the point of Mozilla making their own flavor of this, rather than contributing to X3D. Or hell, any of the several other open source projects of a similar nature.

Well, a few major differences I'm seeing at a glance:

- X3DOM supports Flash as well as an X3D plugin. A-Frame is specifically targeting WebGL and has a much smaller surface area

- A-Frame is based on ThreeJS rather than a custom engine

- A-Frame seems to be embracing modularity a lot more than X3DOM, and it seems likely that users will be able to build highly specialized components published as npm modules (much like we see with React components)

- A-Frame is specifically focused on VR out of the box

- The markup language and intended target audience is significantly different

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#8

Post by fulafel » Thu, Dec 17, 2015, 5:18 PM UTC

wildpeaks wrote: post #2

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D). Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

And XML3D, and Glam.. None of these have seen much uptake, hope Mozilla has better luck.

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#9

Post by [deleted] » Sat, Dec 19, 2015, 9:21 PM UTC

fulafel wrote: post #8

wildpeaks wrote: post #2

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D). Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

And XML3D, and Glam.. None of these have seen much uptake, hope Mozilla has better luck.

[deleted]

Re: A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla

#10

Post by ngokevin » Sat, Dec 19, 2015, 9:22 PM UTC

wildpeaks wrote: post #2

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D). Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

A-Frame is based on an entity-component system. It favors composability over hierarchy. Dig deep in the docs and see that's actually quite different than standard wrapping shapes in HTML elements.