IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#2WOW. That's just nuts! I mean I know linux can be slim, but thats less than a meg!
Really very exciting stuff. I don't know if I should play JC3 or tinker with this.
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#3Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#4Any chance it will support Xen, too, in the future? Also, unikernels should preferably be written in memory safe languages like Rust.
There is a rust project. How is that relevant to this?
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#5> A minimal bootable image, including bootloader, operating system components and a complete C++ standard library is currently 693K when optimized for size. WOW. That's just nuts! I mean I know linux can be slim, but thats less than a meg! Really very exciting stuff. I don't know if I should play JC3 or tinker with this.
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#6> A minimal bootable image, including bootloader, operating system components and a complete C++ standard library is currently 693K when optimized for size. WOW. That's just nuts! I mean I know linux can be slim, but thats less than a meg! Really very exciting stuff. I don't know if I should play JC3 or tinker with this.
This isn't Linux.
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#7> A minimal bootable image, including bootloader, operating system components and a complete C++ standard library is currently 693K when optimized for size. WOW. That's just nuts! I mean I know linux can be slim, but thats less than a meg! Really very exciting stuff. I don't know if I should play JC3 or tinker with this.
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#8Any chance it will support Xen, too, in the future? Also, unikernels should preferably be written in memory safe languages like Rust.
> unikernels should preferably be written in memory safe languages like Rust There is a rust project. How is that relevant to this?
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#9Any chance it will support Xen, too, in the future? Also, unikernels should preferably be written in memory safe languages like Rust.
> unikernels should preferably be written in memory safe languages like Rust There is a rust project. How is that relevant to this?
Isolation can be useful. For example the Postfix email server (running on a Unix, not unikernel) is decomposed into several processes with different privileges. That allows running the most sensitive parts with limited access rights, to protect against attacks, while still running those parts on the same server for efficiency. This process isolation is typically not provided with unikernels.
A lot of unikernels compensate for this by providing language level protection, by using safe high level language (see MirageOS using OCaml, other based on Erlang, haskell or rust). Then it's not process isolation but the language and its implementation that guarantee that provides protection / isolation between components. My understanding is that is what GP refers too.
A unikernel based on C or C++ will have no process isolation, and no language level isolation either. So sensitive components would have to be split into different nodes, isolated by using either separate VMs or machines. That's doable, but adds complexity to the orchestration and possibly some overhead.
Re: IncludeOS: C++ unikernel now free and open source
#10> A minimal bootable image, including bootloader, operating system components and a complete C++ standard library is currently 693K when optimized for size. WOW. That's just nuts! I mean I know linux can be slim, but thats less than a meg! Really very exciting stuff. I don't know if I should play JC3 or tinker with this.
I'm pretty sure you can find MIPS Linux images with Busybox et. all. that weigh less than that. A lot of routers run Linux on 2M eproms including user space.
(That's actually quite big for a tiny-computer OS, although it's the smallest Unix I know of.)