Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
1–10 of 40 posts
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#2After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#3Other than the occasional technical book, I refuse to buy e-books when reading for pleasure. After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#4Other than the occasional technical book, I refuse to buy e-books when reading for pleasure. After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#5Other than the occasional technical book, I refuse to buy e-books when reading for pleasure. After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
I understand where you are coming from, really, I do. My eyes are strained too and I recently got a Kindle (purposely without the backlight) and it is amazing. I'd recommend to give it a try - but I can't really speak for the backlit versions.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#6Other than the occasional technical book, I refuse to buy e-books when reading for pleasure. After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
Have you used a (non-backlit) Kindle or other e-ink display for any length of time? It's difficult for people who haven't tried it to believe, but it feels nothing like staring at a screen. I spend all day in front of a screen as well, but reading my Kindle at the end of the day is no harder on my eyes than looking at a dead-tree book.
E-Readers are one of those technologies that I'm completely unconflicted and wholly supportive of. E-books should be priced better though, to account for the inability to lend them out to people.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#7Other than the occasional technical book, I refuse to buy e-books when reading for pleasure. After spending all day in front of a screen, the last thing I want is another screen in my face when trying to relax with a good book at the end of the day.
Have you used a (non-backlit) Kindle or other e-ink display for any length of time? It's difficult for people who haven't tried it to believe, but it feels nothing like staring at a screen. I spend all day in front of a screen as well, but reading my Kindle at the end of the day is no harder on my eyes than looking at a dead-tree book.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#8Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#9But my kindle 4 lets me stay in sync with my phone (which I can use in the dark and outside the house unprepared, both of which come up a lot). So I tend to read kindle books still, despite a rather large collection of unread fiction.
Re: Did technology kill the book or give it new life?
#10Like writing on a notepad, reading a physical book does a good job of communicating with body language what you're doing. And if you believe in judging books by their cover, the book cover provides further information about its subject. And you can leave physical books in public places to start conversations.
Additionally, large books like cookbooks and illustrated books often come in a large form factor that tablets struggle to match. That's not too surprising, given that humans have been making books for about half a century, but only making tablets for maybe a decade.
And it's mostly the books we don't want others to know we're reading (adult fiction) for which we use the e-reader, where others can't tell what we're reading.