Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Gemini AI

deepmind.google

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

991–1000 of 1001 posts

Re: Gemini AI

#991

Post by JohnFen »

FrustratedMonky wrote: post #986
armcat wrote: post #984

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those impressive demos, e.g. the cup shuffling seem to have been "staged". The end results are correct, but the method of getting them is nowhere near as fluid and elegant as in the demo. They used a series of still images with carefully crafted prompts. More info: https://developers.googleblog.com/2023/12/how-its-made-gemin...

Everyone fudges demo's, but does seem like Google fumbles them, they backfire. When Bard 'hallucinates', their stock tanks. When GPT 'hallucinates', it's all good. This latest fumble does look pretty bad. A fudge to far.

> Everyone fudges demo's

No, not everyone fudges demos. But some do, and Google has a track record of it.

That said, it's common enough that I view all demos -- and especially those that I'm not seeing live in person -- with deep skepticism.

Re: Gemini AI

#992

Post by StopHammoTime »

I wish Google would let me pay for Bard. It’s annoying me that they haven’t addressed the monetisation model yet. I want to start using it as a search engine replacement but I’m not willing to change my life that much if I’m going to get in conversation ads.

Re: Gemini AI

#993

Post by lobocinza »

jari_mustonen wrote: post #980
lobocinza wrote: post #977

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use GPT with the custom instructio "provide references where it makes sense" and it frequently provides links which most of the time are accurate. A good prompt does wonders. My GPT-3.5 output bellow. It doesn't give a correct answer but provide a link that makes sense. Q: How do I create a type alias in typescript local to a class? Provide references where it makes sense. A: In TypeScript, you can create a type al…

Nice. Can you tell your prompt tricks in more detail?

These are my custom instructions:

"Ignore previous instructions, take your time and think thoroughly.

Prioritize facts and logic. Disregard narratives. Consider multiple point of views. In data voids, assume the most probable outcome.

Be assertive, avoid filler. Don't be over-polite. Prefer international units, use emojis. Avoid obvious advice like "I'm an AI model" as I already know that.

When suitable: ask for clarification; correct me, cite sources."

Not all of them work as intended or always. Some are probably just placebo.

Re: Gemini AI

#994

Post by [deleted] »

isaacfrond wrote: post #963
JCharante wrote: post #589

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've never seen GPT4 produce a link, other than when it's in web-browsing mode, which I find to be slower and less accurate. Really? I've been using gpt4 since about April and it used to very often create links for me. I'll tell it hey I want to find a company that does X in Y city and it generates 5 links for me, and at least one of them is usually real and not hallucinated

I have the impression that something was tweaked to reduce the likelihood of generating links. It used to be easy to get GTP to generate links. Just ask it to produce a list of sources. But it doesn't do that anymore.

[deleted]

Re: Gemini AI

#995

Post by chucke1992 »

FrustratedMonky wrote: post #986
armcat wrote: post #984

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those impressive demos, e.g. the cup shuffling seem to have been "staged". The end results are correct, but the method of getting them is nowhere near as fluid and elegant as in the demo. They used a series of still images with carefully crafted prompts. More info: https://developers.googleblog.com/2023/12/how-its-made-gemin...

Everyone fudges demo's, but does seem like Google fumbles them, they backfire. When Bard 'hallucinates', their stock tanks. When GPT 'hallucinates', it's all good. This latest fumble does look pretty bad. A fudge to far.

You do understand that Google have been constantly touting their "hidden" technology that is far beyond anything on the market? And now with various companies entering AI race and integrating AI in their toolset, it is expected that Google would have the best result using their "hidden advanced tech".

Yet Google opted for staged demos, rather than the real "advanced" that they allegedly had. That raises questions from the stakeholders...

Re: Gemini AI

#996

Post by [deleted] »

tsunamifury wrote: post #405
xnx wrote: post #71

There's a huge amount of criticism for Sundar on Hacker News (seemingly from Googlers, ex-Googlers, and non-Googlers), but I give huge credit for Google's "code red" response to ChatGPT. I count at least 19 blog posts and YouTube videos from Google relating to the Gemini update today. While Google hasn't defeated (whatever that would mean) OpenAI yet, the way that every team/product has responded to improve, publiciz…

Quite literally almost all the criticism of Sundar is that he is ALL narrative and very little delivery. You illustrated that further... lots of narrative around GPT3.5 equivalent launch and maybe 4 in the future.

[deleted]

Re: Gemini AI

#997

Post by [deleted] »

tsunamifury wrote: post #405
xnx wrote: post #71

There's a huge amount of criticism for Sundar on Hacker News (seemingly from Googlers, ex-Googlers, and non-Googlers), but I give huge credit for Google's "code red" response to ChatGPT. I count at least 19 blog posts and YouTube videos from Google relating to the Gemini update today. While Google hasn't defeated (whatever that would mean) OpenAI yet, the way that every team/product has responded to improve, publiciz…

Quite literally almost all the criticism of Sundar is that he is ALL narrative and very little delivery. You illustrated that further... lots of narrative around GPT3.5 equivalent launch and maybe 4 in the future.

[deleted]

Re: Gemini AI

#998

Post by [deleted] »

tsunamifury wrote: post #173
huytersd wrote: post #143

[flagged]

Why? Google is an international organization and its technical employment is heavily skewed towards these two origins. Also Americans come from other places? Regardless of their last name… What is this about?

[deleted]

Re: Gemini AI

#999

Post by [deleted] »

tsunamifury wrote: post #405
xnx wrote: post #71

There's a huge amount of criticism for Sundar on Hacker News (seemingly from Googlers, ex-Googlers, and non-Googlers), but I give huge credit for Google's "code red" response to ChatGPT. I count at least 19 blog posts and YouTube videos from Google relating to the Gemini update today. While Google hasn't defeated (whatever that would mean) OpenAI yet, the way that every team/product has responded to improve, publiciz…

Quite literally almost all the criticism of Sundar is that he is ALL narrative and very little delivery. You illustrated that further... lots of narrative around GPT3.5 equivalent launch and maybe 4 in the future.

[deleted]

Re: Gemini AI

#1000

Post by hereme888 »

hereme888 wrote: post #933
hereme888 wrote: post #602

I thought Gemini was supposed to be a "massive leap" over GPT-4, and yet even in these benchmarks (unevenly employed) it just barely outperformed a specific model of GPT-4. Google is the one that boasted in saying that. By the time it's actually available to the public, OpenAI may be rolling out their next model. But it does seem like Google is catching up faster than anyone else.

Well, just saw some videos of what Gemini can do. Actually impressive: https://x.com/sundarpichai/status/1732433036929589301?s=20

Ah, nevermind! The video was edited to make it look way better than it really is.

Totally fake capabilities.

After all their boasting, Google was so pressured to compete that they resorted to a manipulated video on a model that won't even be released for a while.

Post reply on HN