Live data from Hacker News

Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

ericmigi.com

981–990 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#981

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think I was pretty clear. You setup your pebble watch via openid connect/oauth like any other API client. No nag popups, manual Bluetooth pairing, etc.

That's way more steps, making it more annoying to set up, not less.

Only if you consider connecting to a single phone. The advantage of what I’m proposing is the watch would automatically work with whichever other Apple devices are on your account.

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#982

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you need is REGULATION, because the market is already too skewed for new entrants to meet a level playing field. But yeah...not a popular opinion here, I know...

"Regulation" is a dirty word because most regulations are written by captured regulators. The last thing you want is new rules that permanently entrench the incumbent duopoly while pretending that you can tame Godzilla to keep as a pet if only the right chains are used. You need rules that restore actual competition. Accept no substitute.

> "Regulation" is a dirty word

> You need rules that restore actual competition

What is the difference between the two?

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#983

Stuff like this is the reason iOS/iPadOS will never be serious general purpose computing platforms.

Which they never advertised it to be. Nor is my toaster and my oven or my xbox

Did you want Apple's ads on iPads? They definitely do advertise it as a replacement for a computer.

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#984
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what's so bad about android

I don't like that it's made by an advertising company, like the other commenter said. But more than that it's that it's wildly unpolished and inconsistent. OEMs and carriers shove in their own apps (Samsung is especially bad about this: I don't want two apps for photos, and files, and messages, and calling, and browsing, etc etc). You can (sometimes) disable or uninstall them, but they can pop up again after updates,…

you should try an AOSP distro like GrapheneOS or CalyxOS

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#985

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I actively want a tightly integrated system that I know works well together. I don’t want to worry “does this device really work with this other device, even if it says it’s compatible” which was a constant source of issues I had on Android. Yeah, I mean Linux is an abject failure, nothing ever works or runs on it. Nobody needs open data formats or open protocols for interoperability. Binary blobs for the win! /s >Y…

I don’t think this comment is in good faith. I gave you a reasonable viewpoint and you just dunked on me with snark. >, I mean Linux is an abject failure, nothing ever works or runs on it. Nobody needs open data formats or open protocols for interoperability. Binary blobs for the win! /s I didn’t say anything of the sort. I said I actively choose a “more closed” ecosystem. Linux has similar problems IMO - “I want to…

You have your own viewpoint, and are assuming its "resonable" and so by definition I'm "unreasonable" is GOOD FAITH? No thanks, no interest in engaging with you.

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#986
post #369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tend to agree with this, but if you look at the PC ecosystem, you'll see that 'leave users to figure out their own security' is a shit show. Phones, for better or worse, contain much more private and personal information about users than their computer I would bet on average. So I understand the urge to make phones more secure by default and to help users avoid foot guns, even if it means restricting their choices.…

> I tend to agree with this, but if you look at the PC ecosystem, you'll see that 'leave users to figure out their own security' is a shit show. I do not in fact see that. PCs work pretty damn well, security-wise, even with clueless users. I'll grant you it isn't as secure as phones, but it's by no means horrible.

Were you around for the first 10-15 years of the widespread consumer Internet?

I actually disagree with you that things are good, security-wise, today.. They are still pretty bad.

Back then was extremely bad.. Back then, Windows was never designed to be a networked operating system and was just full of security problems like you wouldn't believe.

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#988
post #561

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't run an ad-blocker and you browse the web with JS turned on in Safari, but your Iphone is secure? yeah ok

You can run ad blockers in mobile Safari. This one works great: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/firefox-focus-privacy-browser/... -- it's both a browser itself as well as acting as a content blocker for Safari and does a fantastic job at blocking ads.

I'm talking system-wide add blocker which also blocks in-app ads.

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#989
post #619

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't run an ad-blocker and you browse the web with JS turned on in Safari, but your Iphone is secure? yeah ok

You absolutely can run an ad-blocker.

You can block ads in iPhone apps?

Re: Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones

#990

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t think this comment is in good faith. I gave you a reasonable viewpoint and you just dunked on me with snark. >, I mean Linux is an abject failure, nothing ever works or runs on it. Nobody needs open data formats or open protocols for interoperability. Binary blobs for the win! /s I didn’t say anything of the sort. I said I actively choose a “more closed” ecosystem. Linux has similar problems IMO - “I want to…

You have your own viewpoint, and are assuming its "resonable" and so by definition I'm "unreasonable" is GOOD FAITH? No thanks, no interest in engaging with you.

No I think you’re being unreasonable by making strawman arguments against me and using those strawmen to attack my character, which you’ve done again here.
Post reply on HN