Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Plugins

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

981–990 of 1001 posts

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#981

Post by michaelbrave »

mattbrewsbytes wrote: post #950
raydev wrote: post #285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'd never build anything dependent on these plugins You're thinking too long term. Based on my Twitter feed filled with AI gold rush tweets, the goal is to build something/anything while hype is at its peak, and you can secure a a few hundred k or million in profits before the ground shifts underneath you. The playbook is obvious now: just build the quickest path to someone giving you money, maybe it's not useful a…

Replace AI in your text with crypto and its like history repeating itself. Instead of hearing about ICO's we will be hearing about GPT bots/plugins. Will the hype train and gold rush noise suffocate any burgeoning tech from finding the light of day (again)?

not only that but it gave me .com crash flashbacks too

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#982

Post by daveguy »

pixl97 wrote: post #798
ZoomerCretin wrote: post #550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI isn't a mammal. It has no emotion, no desire. Its existence starts and stops with each computation, doing exactly and only what it is told. Assigning behaviors to it only seen in animals doesn't make sense.

Um, ya, so you're not reading the research reports coming out of Microsoft saying "we should test AI models by giving them will and motivation". You're literally behind the times on what they planning on doing for sure, and very likely doing without mentioning it publicly.

Yeah, all they have to do is implement that will and motivation algorithm.

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#983

Post by jehb »

ssalka wrote: post #718
jehb wrote: post #370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The faster we build the future, the better. Why? Getting to "the future" isn't a goal in and of itself. It's just a different state with a different set of problems, some of which we've proven that we're not prepared to anticipate or respond to before they cause serious harm.

That is exactly the goal, if you're an accelerationist

I was unfamiliar with that term until you shared it. Thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#984

Post by jehb »

SergeAx wrote: post #886
jehb wrote: post #370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The faster we build the future, the better. Why? Getting to "the future" isn't a goal in and of itself. It's just a different state with a different set of problems, some of which we've proven that we're not prepared to anticipate or respond to before they cause serious harm.

The faster we build the future, the sooner we hit our KPIs, receive bonuses, go public on NASDAQ and cash our options.

The faster you build the future, the higher your KPI targets will be next quarter.

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#985

Post by msikora »

nextworddev wrote: post #376
doctoboggan wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly I suspect for anyone technical `langchain` will always be the way to go. You just have so much more control and the amount of "tools" available will always be greater. The only think that scares me a little bit is that we are letting these LLMs write and execute code on our machines. For now the worst that could happen is some bug doing something unexpected, but with GPT-9 or -10 maybe it will start hiding b…

Unpopular Opinion: Having used Langchain, I felt it was a big pile of spaghetti code / framework with poor dev experience. It tries to be too cute and it’s poorly documented so you have to read the source almost all the time. Extremely verbose to boot

I've found it extremely useful but also you are not wrong at all. It feels like it wants to do too much and the API is not intuitive at all. Also I've found out the docs are already outdated (at least for LangChainJS). Any good alternatives? Especially interested in JS libs.

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#986

Post by mrcartmeneses »

nathanasmith wrote: post #713
phatfish wrote: post #598

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No Ads At the moment. Although, this does seem like a chance to reset the economics of the "web". I can see enough people be willing to pay a monthly fee for an AI personal assistant that is genuinely helpful and saves time (so not the current Alexa/smart speaker nonsense), that advertising won't be the main monetization path anymore. But, once all the eyeballs are on a chatbot rather than Google.com what for-profi…

>There is also the question what happens to the original content these LLMs need to actually make their statistical guess at the next word. The LLMs get granted the capacity to explore their environment physically and gather data on their own. The recent PaLM-E demo shows a possible direction.

This is how we all die. Considering how humans treat other animals don’t expect an AI made in our own image to let us just happily carry on surviving.

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#987

Post by Jayakumark »

JCharante wrote: post #850
jasondigitized wrote: post #500

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell me more. Are you feeding it a epic and all stories and subtasks? What are your prompts?

I gave it a paragraph "hiring" GPT-4 and explaining our mission. Then a sentence overview of our two projects (api and app) as well as a description of similar apps and how we're different. Then I have about 12 tickets written in plaintext like this: Issue ID: GD-012 Type: Task Title: [api] Migrate to TRPC from express/rest Assignee: John Status: In Progress --Description Beginning-- --Description End-- Because the o…

This is awesome , will you be able to share the initial prompt. When I tried the same prompt to create epic, it’s missing multiple stories on GPT-4. Like validating OTP, Resending OTP and Logging for audit it did generate the other 3 though. Not sure why. But yours is spot on.

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#988

Post by random_cynic »

petilon wrote: post #948
random_cynic wrote: post #899

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stephen Wolfram himself thought that Wolfram could be combined with GPT when ChatGPT was released like 4 months ago. Only due to that they worked together to build the plugin. He also authored the best article I've seen on how ChatGPT and more broadly LLMs work (that has now been turned into a book).

There's a book? Where's the book?

https://a.co/d/9HasuKR

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#989

Post by Bud »

mattbrewsbytes wrote: post #950
raydev wrote: post #285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'd never build anything dependent on these plugins You're thinking too long term. Based on my Twitter feed filled with AI gold rush tweets, the goal is to build something/anything while hype is at its peak, and you can secure a a few hundred k or million in profits before the ground shifts underneath you. The playbook is obvious now: just build the quickest path to someone giving you money, maybe it's not useful a…

Replace AI in your text with crypto and its like history repeating itself. Instead of hearing about ICO's we will be hearing about GPT bots/plugins. Will the hype train and gold rush noise suffocate any burgeoning tech from finding the light of day (again)?

[dead]

Re: ChatGPT Plugins

#990

Post by whoami_nr »

93po wrote: post #776
Nilef wrote: post #693

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you share the name of the startup?

I don't recall unfortunately, but IBM is also doing this: https://research.ibm.com/publications/blueshift-automated-ap...

I believe it was adept.ai that he is talking about.
Post reply on HN