Live data from Hacker News

Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

femfosec.com

971–980 of 1001 posts

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#971

I have worked with couple female developers and I had many interesting discussions on the whole problem of being woman developer. Here some random thoughts / observations: Hiring women because "we need at least one woman on the team because of the quota". Would you like to know you have been hired because the team is forced to have a women and everybody knows it? Same company. I have received an email that you can "g…

I'll play some devils advocate.

> Hiring women because "we need at least one woman on the team because of the quota". Would you like to know you have been hired because the team is forced to have a women and everybody knows it?

I'm usually the token veteran at a company. We're a protected class too, and I won't be ashamed that I got hired because of that. I let my performance speak for itself and I bet any woman worth her muster would do the same.

> Same company. I have received an email that you can "get bonus if you refer a friend that gets hired." Then a list of how much you can get depending on position. Then a note -- "if a woman, the reward is tripled".

This is admittedly bad, but is probably reflective of the overall lower pool of women they have to hire from. Especially when that pool has to make it through your hiring gates.

> Promoting women before they got enough experience. Similar to above. You have been put on a fast track for promotion but you haven't had time to get the needed experience. Everybody knows this (and discuss behind your back) but nobody is going to tell it to you. Now you have two problems.

I've fast tracked men. So far I haven't had to stand in front of a review committee and explain why, but I'd happily do so. People are going to fuck up when they get fast tracked. If someone snubs their nose because it's a woman instead of a man standing in front of that committee with me, then that's fine. They can take my title too.

> On topic of feedback, people need feedback to improve, but female developers will not get it. All-positive feedback is no feedback at all because you are nowhere closer to knowing what you are doing wrong. I have personally been doing some pretty stupid things (like taking credit for other people work) until somebody told me and I fixed it. I wonder what would I do if nobody dared to tell I am doing anything wrong, or if my salary or position in the team had nothing to do with how well I am actually doing?

This is the same subject as the article. I suspect women who mean well will read this article and will be on a war path to fix things. I know a good amount of feminists (although they're from places like Texas) and I know they wouldn't stand for people who have willed men into fear. That's not what the feminists that I know want.

> Just because guys can't be hitting on girls in the office doesn't mean it isn't there, but now it is more comical.

> Just because people aren't supposed to discriminate women doesn't mean it is not there. Male developers seem to be in large part focused on the fact the words are spoken by a female rather than their merit. I have seen concrete examples. It kinda seems it is still true you need to (at least in some cases) work twice as hard to prove anything, but now male employees got better at hiding their discrimination. I am half decided that maybe all the focus on discrimination achieved is push the discrimination underground.

> Discussions quieting down when you show up. Or tame behavior when eating lunch. Guys reminding other guys that a woman is present. Supposedly because it is not proper to behave like that (but it is fine when only guys present?) Imagine this happening every time.

I don't think many of these policies will stand long term. Remember that many of them came about when _very few_ women were in the industry. Once you have a larger percentage of women present, commonality doesn't need to be enforced by policy. There will be a larger spectrum of womens interests reflected in tech.

You can't stop the dating train. I don't date where I eat, but that's a personal decision. Women are going to get the digs for other women and men and vice versa. A corporation can try to draw lines around privileged positions but those will always be tough until they're glaringly obvious.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#972

I'm reading a whole lot of frustrated comments here and totally get where the frustration is coming from. But in a different direction, I wanted to offer a thought for how to improve: Rule #1: Always ask people if they want feedback before you give it. Do it for men, women and non-binary folks. If you can, give hints about the topic ("hey, would you like feedback about your skills alignment with the problem?"). I've…

As a counter-point, I've known people that would take this as condescending right off the bat, so YMMV.

[deleted]

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#973

I also work in a very “woke culture.” In fact, as a straight, white, cis man I am in the extreme minority. I have been told that I can’t do my job which includes negotiating with LGBTQ+ companies because I am an “old, white, cis guy and there is always an unfair power dynamic there” just because of my identity. It is discrimination plain and simple, but I literally stand to have my career derailed if I fight back. On…

dude just leave, it's not worth your time. go to an engineering firm or something.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#974
post #907

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, its a pendulum that was swung for very long time into one extreme, and now it swung into the opposite similarly extreme one. We can hope that over time things will get to some sort of balanced state, but that might be a wishful thinking for very long time. It's also quite geographic - in this case I mean US-centric (and spreads to rest of the western countries). Ie in eastern europe/former eastern bloc, there w…

Eastern Europe is generally behind on adopting the latest social transformations compared to Western Europe, which in turn is late compared to the US. As such EE is currently not facing the turmoil which has engulfed the US and is well underway in e.g. France or Germany. On the one hand, there's more problems with discrimination and violence against women in EE (except those perpetrated by immigrants), on the other h…

It depends. The US is behind Western Europe when it comes to reducing superstitious believes (religion). But it will catch up eventually.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#975
post #349

This reminds me of Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes. I have to wonder how she may have received criticism of her ideas if there was a baseline of equality of ideas from men and women. Basically, to over-simplify severely, instead of taking criticism as a way to improve, she took it as an attack, which I think was part of what made Theranos insular, overprotective. It would be a bridge too far to link it to the cheating.

I think that's too speculative. I haven't heard her publicly talk about sexism in a way that would make me think that's how she views the world.

I've looked a little bit, and I'm not going to defend my assertion very hard, because I don't truly believe it or it's implications very much; it's an interesting question to me.

Anyway here are some references:

https://fortune.com/2015/12/10/elizabeth-holmes-sexism-thera...

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/elizab...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahart/2019/03/31/womens-his... (mainly a summary with links to other articles)

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#976

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> made some passing comment about the CSS quality not being "ideal" or something of the sort Not saying you weren't the subject of over-reaction, or not, but I think this is an example of sub-par feedback. It would be better to point out the issues in concrete terms, and say this is something that should be addressed, and why. And if you can't do that, you should ruminate on it until you can reify whether it is wrong…

Overall, I agree with you that making bulletproof arguments is a valuable skill in the workplace. Communicating "this is what I think of your work, some of it is negative but isn't intended as an attack against you" (without actually using any of those words, otherwise you run into the "my human trafficking shirt" problem) in a way that you're confident your criticisms won't be used against you, it's a skill you can…

Going back to the OP... they were working in a consultancy roles. A consultant by definition will be liaising, communicating, generating leads, etc. and social skills are pivotal to their success. But I would say broadly for anyone working in software engineering, that effective communication is critical in an industry that's based on translating business requirements from the real world into concrete logic.

> speak your mind without constantly simulating a PR team in your brain.

Certainly not what I'm advocating. But I would say, that off-hand and unexamined opining in a collaborative setting can have a deleterious effect. Particularly if you're in a lead or senior position where your criticisms may often proceed unquestioned, even if they are based on faulty or misapplied intuitions.

In my time as a consultant, I've found I've communicated best and reached the best outcomes when I've refrained from speaking until I'm clear about what I'm saying, and why. The initial reticence allows time for less confident voices to speak their minds, and as a side benefit allow a new perspective to move the conversation.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#977
post #499

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is described in the article isn't sexism - it's fear. Fear of being labeled as a sexist.

It’s probably both. The men are assuming based on the female founder’s gender _alone_ that she might accuse him of sexism. Regardless of how rational this fear is, they are stereotyping new female founders they’re meeting for the first time based on what an X% of other female founder’s have done in the past. For the men, it’s probably a risk/reward calculation. Keep your head down and be polite and have ~0% chance of…

I don't wear a seatbelt because I'm stereotyping the driver of my car as a dangerous driver though, nor am I stereotyping other drivers either.

Risk is the combination of chance of occurence with effect. If the effect is large then a tiny chance is worth making active protections against.

Given what we've seen in the past few years and how such incidents appear to be on the increase, the chance doesn't even seem that tiny.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#978

My wife, who is a second wave feminist that believes that women should be given the same opportunities, but are not victims, ran across some of the craziness a few years ago. She was in a tech forum where a woman was complaining about her experience at a company. It amounted to this woman having a perception that she was not being valued as much as a male colleague and was immediately jumping to the conclusion that i…

If nothing else this will be an interesting time for historians to look back on. At some point sanity must set in and after that I wonder how they will reflect on this period.

At some point sanity must set in

There’s a saying “the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent”

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#979

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For that particular situation, I'd stay silent. I agree there's a risk, and that this is a problem. Longer term though, I'd make sure we hire female investors into my VC fund. I'd take them along the journey of investing with this startup, and if I felt a female CEO needed to be replaced with a man, I'd discuss this with my investment partners. Any harsh feedback, if given, would be coming from all of us, and a mixed…

Any harsh feedback, if given, would be coming from all of us, and a mixed panel would be harder to accuse of sexism. Nope, a hostile founder/CEO will pick the men out of the panel and sick the mob on them. The women on the panel are either oppressed or anti-feminism. The mob doesn't care and won't hear the whole story.

Yep, that's why I used the word "harder" instead of "impossible". At that point, the situation would be within my threshold of acceptable risk.

Re: Female Founder Secrets: Men Clamming Up

#980
post #922

If I were in the situation presented in this article, I'd simply speak my mind. I'm fairly sure that I've been a good ally to the women and non-binary folks in my life, and that people who know me would be quick to defend accusations of misogyny or bias. And if that proved to be incorrect, I'd re-evaluate whether I was doing enough to further women and non-binary people in the tech industry. If, as most in this comme…

This seems naive. When you see Twitter threads cancelling people, your colleagues aren't going to make a dent in that mob even if they are brave enough to stand up for you on public platforms. Honestly, if it's so risky to give candid advice to anyone, why take the risk? There's no reason to. They can make it on their own afterall.

It probably is naive. But my point is more about the fact that it seems to very rarely (never?) be people who are champions of diversity getting cancelled because of one comment they made that got taken out of context. That seems to be what people in this thread are scared of. It's invariably the latent misogynist who's been saying and doing misogynist things their entire life, and this time things erupted instead of being swept under the rug. The lack of evidence of otherwise upstanding people being cancelled seems to go against the narrative that 'this can happen to you' which this article proposes. It'll happen to you, if you don't have a history of being respectful.
Post reply on HN