Do you think those working at ChatGPT have ever wondered how they are contributing to dismantling democracy and ensuring nothing is true by now? The ultimate technological postmodernism.
Tragedy of commons. If you don't do it, somone else will.
ChatGPT Images 2.0
961–970 of 1001 posts
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#962Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s about time we shaft the gatekeepers of talent, and redistribute and socialize the means of art production.
The "Gatekeepers of talent" are generally people who worked very hard to hone a craft. Nothing is stopping you from working very hard to create something.
Yep, that’s the irony, that’s why I’m being tongue in cheek about Marxists’ “seize the means of production”, because people who produce capital also work very hard
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#963So during my Nano Banana Pro experiments I wrote a very fun prompt that tests the ability for these image generation models to follow heuristics, but still requires domain knowledge and/or use of the search tool: Create a 8x8 contiguous grid of the Pokémon whose National Pokédex numbers correspond to the first 64 prime numbers. Include a black border between the subimages. You MUST obey ALL the FOLLOWING rules for th…
banana Pro gets the logic and punts on the art; gpt-2-image gets the art and punts on the logic. Feels like instruction-following and creativity sit on opposite ends of the same slider.
[dead]
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#964Earlier quoted context omitted.
well it is. what if you found out that your wife is actually a robot that you cant tell apart from real human. your real wife. well at least not by cutting her open. would you feel the same being with here?
That's not as bad as when I learned my wife is really just the product of cell division.
... damn, when you say this like that ... i'm now in existential crisis ...
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#965Earlier quoted context omitted.
> except you get shafted That's the point, isn't it? Creating images via AI offers nothing to society. Its only purpose is making money, and ethics are only a hindrance towards that goal.
'I dislike AI, therefore it has no value to anyone.' Who knew the international unit of truth was your feelings?
You're making assumptions, and try to frame those as childish. I dislike the current AI offerings because of their inherent negative contributions to society. "I'm addicted to/invested heavily in AI, so any criticism is flawed."
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#966Earlier quoted context omitted.
> except you get shafted That's the point, isn't it? Creating images via AI offers nothing to society. Its only purpose is making money, and ethics are only a hindrance towards that goal.
I did a lot of AI images to show my friends and enjoy. There was definitely a benefit to society. And my friends used AI as a replacement of stock photos and graphics in their products which offer a ton to society.
> There was definitely a benefit to society.
Because otherwise they would have gone out to the street and mugged old ladies?
> And my friends used AI as a replacement of stock photos and graphics in their products which offer a ton to society.
Yeah, that's the negative contribution. They're basically ripping off artists and designers. If those products offer a ton, some of that money could have gone towards them instead of OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#967The improvement in Chinese text rendering is remarkable and impressive! I still found some typos in the Chinese sample pic about Wuxi though. For example the 笼 in 小笼包 was written incorrectly. And the "极小中文也清晰可读" section contains even more typos although it's still legible. Still, truly amazing progress. Vastly better than any previous image generation model by a large margin.
I found the same with Arabic as well.
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#968Every cent you spend on this, remember: The people who made this possible are not even getting a millionth of a cent for every billion USD made with it (they are getting nothing). Same with code; that code you spent years pouring over, fixing, etc. is now how these companies make so much money and get so much investment. It's like open source, except you get shafted.
poring* over
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#969Every cent you spend on this, remember: The people who made this possible are not even getting a millionth of a cent for every billion USD made with it (they are getting nothing). Same with code; that code you spent years pouring over, fixing, etc. is now how these companies make so much money and get so much investment. It's like open source, except you get shafted.
I don't understand why everyone is all up and arms about Images / Art being generated by AI, but when it comes to code... well who cares? The people who made all the code training data are also getting nothing! Potentially the one difference is that developers invented this and screwed themselves, whereas artists had nothing to do with AI.
Just look at the latest policy for developing for the Playdate console. They explicitly banned AI generated art because they said it takes jobs away from artists, but in the same post said that AI code is allowed
Re: ChatGPT Images 2.0
#970Model card for the API endpoint gpt-image-2 (which may or may not reflect the output from ChatGPT Images 2): https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-image-2 API Pricing is mostly unchanged from gpt-image-1.5, the output price is slightly lower: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing ...buuuuuuuuut the price per image has changed. For a high quality image generation the 1024x1024 price has increased?…
> That doesn't make sense that a 1024x1024 is cheaper than a 1024x1536, [...] I think you meant more expensive, right? Because it would make sense for it to be cheaper as there are less pixels.
just assume everyone here is making typos