Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dumb question. Can these benchmarks be trusted when the model performance tends to vary depending on the hours and load on OpenAI’s servers? How do I know I’m not getting a severe penalty for chatting at the wrong time. Or even, are the models best after launch then slowly eroded away at to more economical settings after the hype wears off?
We don't vary our model quality with time of day or load (beyond negligible non-determinism). It's the same weights all day long with no quantization or other gimmicks. They can get slower under heavy load, though. (I'm from OpenAI.)
Claude Opus 4.6
961–970 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#962Wow, I have been using Open 4.6 and for the last 15 minutes, and it's already made two extremely stupid mistakes... like misunderstanding basic instructions and editing the file in a very silly, basic way. Pretty bad. Never seen this with any model before. The one bone I'll throw it was that I was asking it to edit its own MCP configs. So maybe it got thoroughly confused? I dunno what's going on, I'm going to give it…
It felt like it was at least back to opus 4.5 levels.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#963Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#964Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am having trouble with 4.6 following the most basic of instructions. As an example, I asked it to commit everything in the worktree. I stressed everything and prompted it very explicitly, because even 4.5 sometimes likes to say, "I didn't do that other stuff, I'm only going to commit my stuff even though he said everything". It still only committed a few things. I had to ask again. And again. I had to ask four time…
I have ran into this. The solution is to put something like “Always use `git add -A` or `git commit -a`” in your AGENTS/CLAUDE.md
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#965Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#966Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tell it what git commands to explicitly run and in what order for your desired outcome instead of “commit everything in the worktree” This prompt will work better across any/all models.
> Tell it what git commands to explicitly run and in what order Why don't run the commands yourself then?
After commands or changes are made outside of the agents doing; the agent would notice its world view changed and eventually recover, but that fills up precious context for it to bring itself up to date.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#967Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tell it what git commands to explicitly run and in what order for your desired outcome instead of “commit everything in the worktree” This prompt will work better across any/all models.
I have seen many cases of Claude ignoring extremely specific instructions to the point that any further specificity would take more information to express than just doing it myself.
It’s often because the context is full, I gave a bad prompt or context has conflicting guidance either from direct or indirect (agents.md) prompts.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#968Just tested the new Opus 4.6 (1M context) on a fun needle-in-a-haystack challenge: finding every spell in all Harry Potter books. All 7 books come to ~1.75M tokens, so they don't quite fit yet. (At this rate of progress, mid-April should do it ) For now you can fit the first 4 books (~733K tokens). Results: Opus 4.6 found 49 out of 50 officially documented spells across those 4 books. The only miss was "Slugulus Eruc…
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#969Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, is that what the issue is? I've seen the "flicker" thing as a meme, but as someone who uses Claude Code I've never noticed. I use ghostty mostly, so maybe it's not an issue with ghostty? Or maybe I just haven't noticed it.
Yes it's people using bad tools on underpowered machines as far as I have seen
kilocode runs fine. opencode runs fine. qwen code runs fine. what exactly is Claude code doing that requires so much power? I'm sorry but it sounds like you're speaking from the wrong end.