Live data from Hacker News

Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

reuters.com

961–970 of 1001 posts

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#961

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You forgot one of the best options: ignoring social media altogether.

This is true. For the most part I do. But unfortunately I'm not aware of a better way to be in the academic/research community. Twitter and BlueSky are where the conversations are happening. These do more for paper discovery than things like Google Scholar, Semanitic Scholar, and elsewhere. Not to mention that posts tend to have additional context that is often left out of works, making it easier to bridge into topic…

We need a modern equivalent for old school forums. They were full of people interested in a topic without a lot of noise from people who benefit from disrupting them.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#962

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need rabid fans though to make sure your doubters are yelled down. That's one way Musk gets away with this behavior. Thousands of dimwits yelling down anyone that suggests he may not be operating in good faith.

How many of them are even real though? I'm pretty sure Musk has a troll farm for a long time now, back in twitter days his supporters' profiles already looked very suspicious

Wouldn't be surprised if the majority of xAI's GPU resources are being used for writing pro-Elon responses to Twitter comments.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#963

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" By moving much faster than the bureaucracy and legal system can respond, the question on whether he has the power or authority to do the things he's doing may become moot." This is a risky strategy if it is later determined that Musk broke laws with DOGE and is arrested and convicted.

lol. Trump has immunity, and can also pardon

Musk can be convicted AFTER Trump isn't president.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#964

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is true. For the most part I do. But unfortunately I'm not aware of a better way to be in the academic/research community. Twitter and BlueSky are where the conversations are happening. These do more for paper discovery than things like Google Scholar, Semanitic Scholar, and elsewhere. Not to mention that posts tend to have additional context that is often left out of works, making it easier to bridge into topic…

We need a modern equivalent for old school forums. They were full of people interested in a topic without a lot of noise from people who benefit from disrupting them.

I agree. I think we've made a terrible mistake and forgot something important: you can't make a product for everyone. As long as people are not uniformly distributed, then it means there is no real "center" point. On a random normal distribution, you can find a point that is minimizes the distance to all others, but that point will not be representative of the distribution itself. If you try to make something for everyone, you make something that is for no one. Instead, we then need to make environments. Places for others to build. This ends up being the only thing that can be for everyone.

Is that not the magic of the computer? You can build and make it your own? You can program it and make new creations? A computer is nothing without the programs and if programs could only be created by those with the means to make computers, we'd only have calculators. Is this not the magic of the internet? Where we can make new connections and build our own spaces and things inside this environment? If the building was limited to those who built the environment, would it be anything like it is today? Is this not the magic of the smartphone? Where we build apps and programs for others to use? If apps could only be developed by Apple and Google, would we even have a flashlight app?

It seems a mistake to close the doors, to board up the windows, and reinforce the walls. It is fear that causes us to do this, thinking we must seek control to maintain our "power." But even a king is benefited when the subjects are free to dream. The fear that giving up a little power will result in losing it all has only led to having less power in all.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#965
post #823

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or the press pretending that it was a nazi salute, outrage sells.

I'm curious if you know what a Nazi salute looks like? Make a comparison by looking it up, he does the salute twice. Of course you can argue in bad faith because it costs you nothing to be wrong but does that imply you are promoting this behavior? Seems like the obvious implication The media is outraged because a duck quacks like a duck

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy48v1x4dv4o I really don't buy it, it just looks like an awkward gesture. From the article:

But the Anti-Defamation League, an organisation founded to combat antisemitism, did not agree.

"It seems that Elon Musk made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute," it posted on X.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#966

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reason is because his critics have nothing substantial to criticize him about. Name-calling is an admission that you got nothing.

People call Putin enough names. I'm sure they have a lot of reasons for that. Same goes for Gavin.

People mostly use descriptions like "dictator" or "murderer" for Putin, not wordplay based insults.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#967

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If only there were professionals we could pay to go into an organization and find waste, fraud, and abuse so we wouldn't have to rely on people like @ricwe123 on X. Ah, yes, there are. They're called auditors. They audited USAID 4 months ago. The entire US government spent only $7.7MM on Politico over the last 12 months. Oooo spooky stuff, if only there was a way to see what for! Turns out there is. You can scroll do…

Millions of dollars worth of subscriptions for reporting on government press releases with added spin seems like a great example of waste to me... The government shouldn't be paying any media outlets purely due to the conflict of interest, regardless. > Or are we to believe that competence is just arbitrarily cross-applicable? I would wager that even you are more competent than the average auditor, assuming you know…

[flagged]

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#969
post #954
post #908

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why illegitimate? The Americans voted for him.

Musk wasn't on the ballot.

So you can't hire him as part of the department? There are hundreds of department heads that are not elected eithier.

Re: Musk-led group makes $97B bid for control of OpenAI

#970
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I absolutely hate how much CEOs acting like children / influencers has become the norm. Maybe they were always like this, and twitter has just given us a window into it, but I for one would wholeheartedly welcome a return to "respectability" norms for business and civic leaders.

I think the grass roots of the tech world has some portion of the blame here. The introduction of hoodies, flip-flops, open drama and bickering, and kicker into the office environment is not unrelated. And it’s not just CEOs, we’ve now got a senator who looks like the guy I bought pot from as a kid. I never thought I’d make this argument, but maybe at least appearing respectable increases the odds that you’ll actuall…

what people wear seems way more superficial than what people say and do
Post reply on HN