Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Go

amazon.com

961–970 of 1001 posts

Re: Amazon Go

#961
post #29

They will most certainly be tracking a lot more than just you picking up your item. The data they collect about shopping behavior will be interesting. Like, how long I hesitated before I picked up something, what I had already in my "cart" at the time, what deals I looked at but passed on, etc.

I definitely can see that they will collect more. I imagine it would be similar to what they currently do online but now applying it to a physical store.

Re: Amazon Go

#962
post #10

Technology aside, shoppers are going to feel so weird doing this at the beginning. There's already social anxiety when people pay for things and walk past a security guard, or a security barrier. Whether it's an airport, or a clothes store, or a ticket barrier, there's always a nervousness about being called out. It's bad enough in the Apple Store where you can pay and walk out, this will take some real getting used…

I have heard people talk about this as becoming a race issue, and I agree. This is basically an iteration of self-checkout, and if that has issues with people being profiled at the store exit (which it does) then this will too.

Just wait for dynamic pricing!

Re: Amazon Go

#963

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I pay with a contactless card when I do my shopping, so the money transaction takes about a second. It's still too slow, because you have to put your stuff in the bag/backpack etc. (admittedly, this is the shop's fault - they don't have the separator so people can load stuff while the next person is being ringed up). But in most countries, it's not that the shops can't make it faster, it's that they don't want to. Th…

Keeping people in jobs is absolutely not of dubious value. And if you think Amazon Go is designed to create new jobs, I think you're in for a serious disappointment. Working at a grocery like Aeon is probably a legit full-time career for a lot of single mothers, elderly, and others who need jobs that don't require advanced degrees.

I'm going to steal something I saw in my social media feed a while ago: "I'd like people to move away from the notion that people need to be doing boring, tedious things in exchange for money".

And I can guarantee that there are zero businesses designed to create jobs. Businesses are designed to create value, jobs are a byproduct.

There are going to be fewer and fewer jobs in the future, and the sooner societies adjusts, the better. Keeping people in unsustainable jobs will only slow this transformation.

I'm biased, by the way, because I'm from a post-communist country - we've had the "jobs for everyone" thing, and it wasn't working very well.

Re: Amazon Go

#964
post #803

Look, I know this might not be a popular view here on HN, but I think this is useless. And bad. I'm not talking about the technology behind it (I think it's an amazing achievement).. I live in Barcelona and I have at least 5 medium-sized supermarkets within 5 minutes walking distance from my home. Plus there are several smaller shops that sell fruits and vegetables. I know all the people who work in these supermarket…

It seems you agree with Vonnegut: [When Vonnegut tells his wife he's going out to buy an envelope] Oh, she says, well, you're not a poor man. You know, why don't you go online and buy a hundred envelopes and put them in the closet? And so I pretend not to hear her. And go out to get an envelope because I'm going to have a hell of a good time in the process of buying one envelope. I meet a lot of people. And, see some…

My real life experience - met Vonnegut as I was walking to work (Manhattan, NYC).

Me: "Sir, are you Mr.Vonnegut?".

KV: "Hmph". Me: "It is an honor to meet you. Fan of yours from when I was 16".

KV: "OK".

Still very fond of him and his works :)

Re: Amazon Go

#965
post #916
post #729

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is there any evidence that reducing the number of jobs correlates to lower prices?

The last 300 years during which capitalism and tech have done more for the common man than any other ststem in the last 30,000.

Uh... I'm not a luddite, nor comparing the modern world w/ pre-electricity society.

I'm specifically asking about the assumption that "if we remove cashiers, supermarkets will obviously bring the prices down" (as a counter-example, I remember reading somewhere that Seattle's minimum wage didn't affect inflation in any meaningful way)

Re: Amazon Go

#966
post #924

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Australia if you break something in store, they typically wont charge you, but if they do, they have to charge at cost. I wonder if this another reason many stores dont charge. As any store with a larger markup would have to let you know that $55 vase they were trying to sell you cost them $6.

I've never heard this "rule" before, do you have a source? "Cost" is a pretty flimsy concept.

I may be wrong... I read this previously that was very clear about the customer was due to pay the supplier cost. But I did a google now to find the article and the best I could find is this is a civil case and not "not covered by the Australian Consumer Law" and it seems to be at discretion of the court for value lost and how at fault you were.

https://www.consumer.vic.gov.au/shopping/refunds-and-returns...

Re: Amazon Go

#967
post #924

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Australia if you break something in store, they typically wont charge you, but if they do, they have to charge at cost. I wonder if this another reason many stores dont charge. As any store with a larger markup would have to let you know that $55 vase they were trying to sell you cost them $6.

I've never heard this "rule" before, do you have a source? "Cost" is a pretty flimsy concept.

I think the rule is that, when a business charges a consumer a penalty fee of any kind, the fee must relate to actual costs that the customer's actions imposed on the business. A business could estimate the cost of bananas, but they couldn't use the sale price if that was usually ten times the cost. This applies to things like bank overdraft fees and hotel cleaning charges as well. The idea is that consumer contracts can recover costs, but aren't allowed to punish people.

I don't have a source for that.

Re: Amazon Go

#968

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Keeping people in jobs is absolutely not of dubious value. And if you think Amazon Go is designed to create new jobs, I think you're in for a serious disappointment. Working at a grocery like Aeon is probably a legit full-time career for a lot of single mothers, elderly, and others who need jobs that don't require advanced degrees.

I'm going to steal something I saw in my social media feed a while ago: "I'd like people to move away from the notion that people need to be doing boring, tedious things in exchange for money". And I can guarantee that there are zero businesses designed to create jobs. Businesses are designed to create value, jobs are a byproduct. There are going to be fewer and fewer jobs in the future, and the sooner societies adju…

I agree with you about jobs for the sake of keeping people busy. However, one of the great lessons I am learning in Japan is that human beings are capable of exceeding automation, as long as those human beings are participating in a healthy social environment. In the West, we often set low expectations for people because we cater to the lowest common denominator and we tolerate socially regressive behaviors. The dark side of Japanese society is a willingness to cut bait on people who aren't team players and a vulnerability when leadership isn't up to the task. On the other hand, there is a tremendous distribution of skills and the work ethic is astonishing to my American eyes. People unironically aim for perfection in even the most menial tasks--something that I think is the key to personal satisfaction and has a huge benefit to the society at large.

Re: Amazon Go

#969

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny how I just finish my Thesis on automation and its effects on globalization and the workforce the day before this comes out...

Well, are you gonna share that with us? :-)

As soon as I publish it I will ;)

Re: Amazon Go

#970
post #874

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "dystopian" if you're on private property and have accepted their terms of service. You can avoid surveillance by, you know, choosing not to shop there.

If there is no way for me to delete my personal data after i leave the store, i find it distopyan. If one day all the stores are like this, I guess you may argue I can still grow my own food, and everything is fine.

> If there is no way for me to delete my personal data after i leave the store, i find it distopyan.

By "personal data", if you mean the video footage of your shopping, then it will probably be deleted after a few days/weeks. It will just be used to train (reinforce) the machine learning model, and will be discarded eventually. But your shopping history will always be there, as it is now in online shopping sites...

Post reply on HN