Live data from Hacker News

Google Antigravity

antigravity.google

931–940 of 1001 posts

Re: Google Antigravity

#931

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It is a vs code fork Google may have won the browser wars with Chrome, but Microsoft seems to be winning the IDE wars with VSCode

I wouldn't bet on an Electron app winning anything long-term in the dev-oriented space.

Care to explain why? I like Electron but I've switched to Tauri because it feels way faster and more secure.

Re: Google Antigravity

#932
It's fascinating to me how far they de-emphasize product screenshots on the website, even in the video on it. And the pricing page is all but blank.

Really reflects how companies are prioritizing hype and adoption over product quality.

(now off to download it...)

Re: Google Antigravity

#933
post #755
post #392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If both work equally well then why does it matter whether Zed or VSCode is under the hood?

I think the point is that they don’t both work equally well.

Then maybe they shoulda elaborated on that? /shrug

Re: Google Antigravity

#934
Lots of commenters are simply calling this a VSCode fork and I think they're missing something important as far as how this product fits into the market.

Anthropic and OpenAI are investing a lot into this space and are now competing directly with companies like Cursor. Cursor's biggest moat at the moment is their tab completion model, which doesn't exist in the Anthropic's and OpenAI's current offerings and is leagues ahead of Github Copilot's.

Antigravity is a VSCode fork that adds both Google's own tab complete and an agent composer, similar to products like https://conductor.build/. Assuming that Google doesn't shoot themselves in the foot (which they seem to like doing), we'll see if wrappers like Cursor / Windsurf / Cognition can compete against the big labs. It's worth noting that the category seems to be blurring, since Cursor has trained not only their own tab complete model but also their own agent model.

Re: Google Antigravity

#935

I gave it a fair shot. It is a vs code fork. There were some UI glitches. Some usability was better. Cursor has some real annoying usability issues - like their previous/next code change never going away and no way to disable it. Design of this one looks more polished and less muddy. I was working on a project and just continued with it. It was easy because they import setting from cursor. Feels like the browser wars…

As someone who used to work there, Google will never get product releases right in general because of how bureaucratic and heavyweight their launch processes are. They force the developing team to have a huge number of meetings and email threads that they must steer themselves to check off a ridiculously large list of "must haves" that are usually well outside their domain expertise. The result is that any non-critic…

Yep, that and (also used to work there) the motivations of the implementing teams end up getting very detached from the customer focus and product excellence because of bureaucratic incentives and procedures that reward other things.

There's a lot of "shipping the org chart" -- competing internal products, turf wars over who gets to own things, who gets the glory, rather than what's fundamentally best for the customer. E.g. Play Music -> YouTube Music transition and the disaster of that.

Re: Google Antigravity

#937
post #378

"Congratulations, you have been elevated to manager to agents." That's not exactly really where I hoped my career would lead. It's like managing junior developers, but without having nice people to work with.

You are being rescued. Do not resist.

Re: Google Antigravity

#938
I've been using it today and honestly I'm impressed. I seem to be the exception when I say I don't care it's a vscode fork. Having access to the extension ecosystem seems like a boon to me and I could quickly get a setup to my liking to rival my current Jetbrains Claude Code setup.

It seems to streamline my existing Claude Code workflow with a much better UI. The tab complete seems the best I've experienced and the text/image selection, adding comments and iterating on a plan is genius.

Depressing to see everyone here unable to see the forest for the trees.

Re: Google Antigravity

#939

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You wouldn’t. It’s made to suck out investor money and show that google does something, not to actually bring value. My crystal ball says it will be shutdown next year.

Investor money? Google is highly profitable. It's not looking for investment, it's the one investing. Maybe you are confusing it with OpenAI?

I think they are referring to public market investors vs private investors. Meaning, their stock valuation.

Re: Google Antigravity

#940

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With Ultra I hit that limit in 20 minutes with Gemini 3 low. When the rate limit cleared some hours later, I got one prompt before hitting limit again.

perhaps you were feeding into its the context your whole node_modules folder? :/

You'd really hope that an AI IDE would know to respect .gitignore
Post reply on HN