Live data from Hacker News

FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

nbcnews.com

921–930 of 1001 posts

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#921
post #818
post #808

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Killing your own citizens is.

One person showed up with a gun, the other tried to flee (or run over) an officer.

Neither of which is justified in being killed.

Unless you live in China or North Korea perhaps, maybe then the officers are allowed to blast you to pieces for any of these situations.

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#922
post #836

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> grassroots political opponents Organised criminal activity. Edit: I’m not complaining about moderation but it would be fascinating to know what part of this others believe is incorrect: - Do you think the Anti ICE groups are not organised? - Do you think obstructing federal officers is not criminal? - Something else.

Organized as in they have meetings, serve cookies, and coffee? Most likely not. These anti-ice groups seem to be extemporaneous meetups. Define obstruction. Everything reported, blowing whistles, encouraging businesses not provide service to ICE agents, and recording from a distance is not obstruction. It's a First Amendment right to keep government forces in check.

[flagged]

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#923

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conspiracy to impede and obstruct criminal behaviour is not a crime, it's legitimate self-defence. The fact that federal agents are breaking the law doesn't change that. At all. In spite of what you've been told federal LEO are bound by the law. Executing random bystanders on a whim, operating without visible ID, failing to allow congressional oversight of facilities, failing to give those captured access to a lawyer…

[flagged]

> The behaviour being impeded and obstructed is not criminal. It is, in fact, law enforcement.

If the behavior appears criminal at a glance, it is reasonable to step in; law enforcement should be aware of this and exhibit accordingly professional behavior such that it does not appear to be so criminally violent. The simple fact they're law enforcement is moot to whether said behavior is criminal, seeing as law enforcement can still be charge with crimes.

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#924

Reading the comments on this is the first time I've hoped that most HN comments are made by bots.

I think it's important to assess the quality of the comments - they aren't bringing facts, just stating opinions; doing so quickly and agreeing with each other. You can test this out - pick a few names on the comments that disagree, ctrl+f, and you'll quickly find one individual with 29 comments at the time of writing all over the thread; with a handful of others with 1-4 responses. This is not actually what the majo…

In my comments, I add opinions after the facts. Nor have I been donwvoted to oblivion. IMO, the people who I reply to aren't really acquainted with the facts.

I on the other hand happen to be a "bootlicker", while their opinion seems to be that it's ok to interfere with police work, and that the person that got shot did nothing wrong..

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#925
post #836

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> grassroots political opponents Organised criminal activity. Edit: I’m not complaining about moderation but it would be fascinating to know what part of this others believe is incorrect: - Do you think the Anti ICE groups are not organised? - Do you think obstructing federal officers is not criminal? - Something else.

Preventing out-of-control federal officers from committing crimes is NOT criminal. Especially when you don't even know if they ARE federal officers, and won't show their faces, badges, or warrants.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46798601

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#926

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t like political power being used to go after an intimidate opponents at all, but we can’t pretend that it wasn’t a constant during the previous admin. If I recall correctly, they actually set the precedent here by adding civil war era conspiracy charges to put an additional 10 years on women who protested in front of an abortion clinic. AI summary… > Six of the protesters (including Heather Idoni) were convict…

Here's one the members of that group: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/tennessee-woman-sentenc... > As a Health Center staff member ('Victim-1') attempted to open the door for the volunteer, WILLIAMS purposefully leaned against the door, crushing Victim-1’s hand. Victim-1 yelled, "She’s crushing my hand," but WILLIAMS remained against the door, trapping Victim-1’s hand and injuring it. > On the livestream on June…

Replied on another comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46798663

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#927

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are you getting at? The idea of any of the major news outlets in the US being left-leaning is risible nowadays.

[flagged]

Recognizing the US federal government is behaving in a way consistent with facism is no longer a left leaning position.

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#928

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> by force, intimidation, or threat You seem to be glossing over the key piece of that statute. Peaceful protest is protected by the first amendment (free speech, right to assembly).

[flagged]

I've seen pictures of someone with a damaged finger. Given the wild differences between video evidence and what the top levels of the administration claim happen, I think a healthy degree of scepticism is warrented.

Could easily have been hurt by their own flashbang devices or caught it in a car door.

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#929

What is it like in the US these days? I'm on the outside (occasionally) looking in, and it looks like something out of European history class! The ice seem to have roughly the same priorities and roughly the same methodology as the SA had in the beginning. Is stuff really as bad as it looks or are media somehow exaggerating things? I mean I saw the pretti videos and it certainly seems to corroborate what media is say…

The best way I can put it... All the people I know are at work when most of this protest news is happening.

Re: FBI is investigating Minnesota Signal chats tracking ICE

#930

What is it like in the US these days? I'm on the outside (occasionally) looking in, and it looks like something out of European history class! The ice seem to have roughly the same priorities and roughly the same methodology as the SA had in the beginning. Is stuff really as bad as it looks or are media somehow exaggerating things? I mean I saw the pretti videos and it certainly seems to corroborate what media is say…

>What is it like in the US these days?

Pretty normal unless you're an illegal immigrant. Despite what the media tells you and all your pearl clutching coworkers are told to think by said media.

Post reply on HN