Live data from Hacker News

The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

teachforamerica.org

921–922 of 922 posts

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#921
post #289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Conservatives, except the far-right nut-cases and wackos are more likely to support equality of opportunity I have yet to hear any conservative advocate for more balanced education funding between school districts, more unified national standards for education, lowering tuition costs for public colleges or any other policy that suggests an "equality of opportunity" with regard to education. Instead, I tend to hear…

Late reply here. Can you elaborate on "more balanced education funding between school districts"?

My experience as a Maryland taxpayer is Baltimore City spends far more tax dollars per student than any school district in the state. And has for many years. They also have more documented, charged, corruption than any school district in the state. And regarding standardized testing...

"BALTIMORE (WBFF) — Baltimore City Public Schools is among the highest funded large school districts in the country. On average, it receives nearly $16,000 per student, per year. Yet, it’s also one of the lowest-performing. Compared to similarly-sized urban school systems, Baltimore places near the bottom for student proficiencies in math and reading.

[...]

One of the most alarming findings came in January, when a Baltimore City teacher came forward with information, showing more than 75% of students tested at one high school are reading and doing math at an elementary school level."

Re: The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted education programs (2021)

#922

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you single out the elimination of a specific program as a proxy for what you really want, The problem is that in New York at least the gifted programs are the direct mechanism by which rich parents uphold the status quo of segregation. The gifted prgrams are not a proxy, they are a symptom. As I said elsewhere in this thread: we are looking for a fair allocation of resources to actually give schools the ability…

Aren't poorer Chinese students the ones that dominate various gifted programs throughout the city? Rich parents send their kids to private daycares and schools like Collegiate. More funding doesn't solve the problem. If that were case, the whole country could have spent it's way out of special education. At an median of $24K per student, New York has plenty of funding. Kansas city once tried an unlimited funding mode…

Yes, but apparently that's "segregation". The notion is ridiculous. The gifted programs are open to any New Yorker, even poor first generation immigrants like the Chinese in Flushing, as long as they put in the effort to meeting or exceed the standards.
Post reply on HN