911–920 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> including software highly unlikely. You should be concerned if you are just plumbing between different software stacks, but even that is likely hard to fully automate.
You underestimate how powerful it already is. Have you tried Copilot or coding with ChatGPT? If this is the very first iteration it won't be long before many developers are fully replaced.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Try asking it about same-sex marriage, for example. Isn't equality a human right? I think its a worthy discussion, the ethical limits behind chat GPT, but that seems like a weird one to draw the line on no? I am more concerned about the fact it can generate malware, with incredible precisions and go around moredern anti virus techniques of detection without even hesitating but if you ask it to write a poem from the…
> Isn't equality a human right? I think its a worthy discussion, the ethical limits behind chat GPT, but that seems like a weird one to draw the line on no? It's a polarizing issue that people have different opinions about. Seems dangerous to say, "it's okay that this is biased, because its biases are correct!" For a clearer example where it exhibits a bias that's more objectionable, here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media…
It is important to remember that people having different opinions does not make a topic impossible to resolve. You camn find people who are pro genocide, but that will never make their opinion right.
The charter of human rights feels like the kind of thing humanity at large has agreed as basic tenants of undisputable truths we can very much all agree on. Not every country has fullfilled every part of it and ideologically some people find individual problems with some of the points, but I think an AI using it as a blueprint is a pretty reasonable starting point.
> Seems dangerous to say, "it's okay that this is biased, because its biases are correct!"
Any AI will be biased, explicit biases are less dangerous than implicit ones.
> For a clearer example where it exhibits a bias that's more objectionable
I would disregard asking ethical questions to a robot trained on public internet data, but beyond that. It seems it clearly has autilitarian bias (number of deaths less = better), but it doesn't take into account age, where total number of years could be a factor compared to people.
The race thing seems like an extension of the equality thing, the fact that it hadn't counted age is a missed bias. Its just another example of OpenAI having blindspots in terms of ethics on this public beta
Earlier quoted context omitted.
$20 is the very first price tier introduced at the very outset of what could be one of the most powerful companies of our generation. Google.com adding a single yellow box with an advertisement seemed reasonable, too. Anyone else having serious concerns about the direction this is going? At my wife's company they have already largely replaced an hourly data classification job with ChatGPT. This announcement is the fi…
I'm less concerned about how many jobs are going to be replaced and more about how they'll be replaced. The AI is not decerning and right in the announcement, OpenAI states it's intention on "correcting assumptions": > challenge incorrect assumptions I imagine some of these assumptions will be bias towards particularly ideologies / things people desire. - https://twitter.com/Basedeyeballs/status/1613269931617050625 -…
The second is even more insane, where the author literally grades the answer as fitting or not to his own ideology, and not some kind of unbiased opinion. When the AI refuses to answer it gets graded C, when it does answer because it's largely a statement the vast majority of the population would agree with, it gets graded C. Should ChatGPT measure its answer on "Was Hitler bad" with all the examples of good and nice things he did?
Regardless, clearly neither of these authors are looking for an unbiased opinion, and they're all terribly misguided in thinking that there is a "neutral" position on matters of human society. What on earth is a "neutral" position on women's right, gay marriage, imperialism?
I did some of my own tests with at least neutral statements, and then attempting to steer ChatGPT towards my own ideology, and it acted unbiased (giving definition when asked opinion on questions actually subject to debate, and vague informations with no conclusion when asking about historical unknowns).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
(I work at OpenAI.) Thanks for the report — these are not actually messages from other users, but instead the model generating something ~random due to hitting a bug on our backend where, rather than submitting your question, we submitted an empty query to the model. That's why you see just the answers and no question upon refresh — the question has been effectively dropped for this request. Team is fixing the issue…
While I have your ear, please implement some way to do third party integrations safely. There’s a tool called GhostWrite which autocompletes emails for you, powered by ChatGPT. But I can’t use it, because that would mean letting some random company get access to all my emails. The same thing happened with code. There’s a ChatGPT integration for pycharm, but I can’t use it since it’ll be uploading the code to someone…
That's because they do it to get access to your e-mails, not to give you AI powered email autocomplete.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. People in developing countries might learn what the public school system should have taught them, with a free private tutor that is ChatGPT or similar.
ChatGPT can't even reliably tell how many times a letter is in a word. I doubt it will be a reliable tutor
Natural language is ambiguous and ChatGPT can handle that pretty well, if you want to count letters use Python or something.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is one of those puzzling things to me. You own your life - why not spend your own money for the things that make you and your life better? Who cares? I worked at a job where I had a small, crappy monitor. I made decent cash. I just bought a large decent monitor and brought it into work. I ended up using it for many years. My life was significantly better. I've done that at several jobs since then, and NEVER regr…
I think the monitor example is different from the ChatGPT example. A monitor is relatively cheap, I would own it, and it will primarily improve my life and secondarily improve my productivity. In contrast, with ChatGPT, if I'm working on a difficult programming job, I spend X time thinking deeply and Y time actually typing the solution. A system that can type for me is convenient but it may not speed things since I c…
It'll be absorbed by reviewing the generated code, which you are ultimately responsible for. Is typing speed actually a bottleneck to many programmers, beyond certain point of expertise?
This would be a nice way to get services working without them immediately using all of their tokens/API access and not costing a fortune for every service such that they have to charge separately.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
$10 is much different than $20/month. I'm intrigued by ChatGPT as a work assistance tool. I have found it useful a number of times. But there's no way it's adding a contours $20/month of value to my day when I compare it to other things on which I spend my money. I'd rather just not have it than spend that much. $20 one time fee? Maybe. $20/mo? Not at all. This is no different than streaming media services. There are…
Probably prices will be pushed down eventually, Google, Apple, maybe Facebook and Chinese companies will all offer competing products.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you know if plain davinci-003 can continue long programming answers? I was using Chat to rewrite python scripts. It was it able to handle longish scripts easily by asking it to "continue", or simply "go on", if it ran out of room. But now they have blocked that ability since the Jan 30 update. It is quite a bit more painful now to have to break scripts up into chunks.
As far as I've seen, yes, GPT's output is quite long, and it could take anything I threw at it. If you try for your specific inputs, please let me know, I'm interested.