Secondly, he's like the Trump of tech: China, China, China.
Thirdly, he needs to cut it out with the guardrails and other safety BS he's peddling. If we're going to get Skynet, we will get it no matter what we do.
901–910 of 1001 posts
Secondly, he's like the Trump of tech: China, China, China.
Thirdly, he needs to cut it out with the guardrails and other safety BS he's peddling. If we're going to get Skynet, we will get it no matter what we do.
Between China and US theres a defacto unequal distillation environment. China has no qualms about distilling off other labs outputs. US labs actively avoid it for legal reasons. Whatever the actual legalities, US labs have a relative hand tied behind their back. If they didn’t, it’d be easier for Grok, Gemini, and Meta to catch up.
If we care about US competitiveness, then one solution could be either OpenAI/Anthropic enter distillation agreements with other US labs. Or we decide to make distillation public domain / legal.
Until then the only models Anthropic/US Govt could realistically regulate would be in the US market. And that’s as much a losing game as tariffs.
To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of open models -- what should be done about open weight bioweapon and cyber-offense capabilities? Is it simply the cost of freedom that we should allow attackers to access these tools? The OpenAI / Hugging Face incident shows what a GPT 5.6 level model can do off the leash; within ~6 months, open weight models will match this and every bad actor under the sun will be a…
Schrödinger's China at once is an evil entity looking to use AI for their own nefarious purposes yet also willing to cooperate with their main competitor to prevent other actors (who??) from achieving similar goals (all while under a chip embargo too!!) The reality is much less confusing: Anthropic CEO does not wish for models with similar (or greater) capabilities compared to his own closed and overpriced ones to be…
Booo! "authoritarian hands". Scary Its not like current US regime is using AI for: 1) Mass military operations across the globe 2) Mass surveilance of its citizens 3) Removing every possible safety guard from AI/climate regulation 4) Stealing data across the world to train its own closed-source models 5) Is openly antidemocratic, destabilizing EU and economy of whole world I wonder why company which is actively coope…
In the first paragraph, > Anyone who has read my past writing should know that I don’t regard such bans as a useful measure, Later (on banning chip sales to china) > we should crack down on the rampant smuggling and workarounds used to obtain access to such chips. If you truly believe that bans don't work, the same applies to hardware too. Furthermore, Dario says later "To address these concerns, I do support the fol…
I bet via regulatory capture that evaluating Chinese models will be a very slow process if Dario gets his way.
I enjoy using Opus, but I am in the process of ripping it out of my toolkit and leaving it on the ground behind me, as I walk away.