Live data from Hacker News

Googlebook

googlebook.google

901–910 of 1001 posts

Re: Googlebook

#901

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like the top panel in gnome. You need a place for your clock and you status icons. I don't really care much if it's at the top or bottom or sides. As an aside: From a 'clickability' perspective the app menus in the top bar are nice of course and I theoretically agree that's the best place for an app menu. But in practice I really dislike macos' 'separated' app menus when a window is not maximized.

On MacOS it was a great example of the use of Fitts law, a vertically infinite target for your mouse pointer for commonly used tasks when you didn't memorize the keyboard command. But on a giant monitor it's too far away from your work. Macs, for the longest time, had 512x342, 640x480 or 512x384. It was already getting far away at 1152x882.

Even better, Command-? opens a search menu (usually under the "Help" button) that points you at the first matching menu option (even if there's no shortcut for it). The Unity DE tried to replicate that with their HUD feature, but it wasn't universal. It's an incredible feature and I wish everyone copied it.

Re: Googlebook

#902
I'm pretty much at I need very strong justification to own something I haven't wiped and installed a clean and open operating system on. I'm certainly curious if this is easy to do with this device, but I suspect the intention is quite the opposite

Re: Googlebook

#904
post #902

I'm pretty much at I need very strong justification to own something I haven't wiped and installed a clean and open operating system on. I'm certainly curious if this is easy to do with this device, but I suspect the intention is quite the opposite

Its google. What do you expect?

Re: Googlebook

#905
post #902

I'm pretty much at I need very strong justification to own something I haven't wiped and installed a clean and open operating system on. I'm certainly curious if this is easy to do with this device, but I suspect the intention is quite the opposite

Its google. What do you expect?

I've already stated what I expect

Re: Googlebook

#906
post #27

Google seems to have made an official post on Reddit describing the feature set in detail: https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/1tb8xls/introducin... [Edit] And, the feature set references the 'AI mouse pointer' from this Deepmind blog.. https://deepmind.google/blog/ai-pointer/

“Hey google, do something with this. Huh, I guess that’s fine.”

Yeah... "Google, please do the thinking for me, it hurts!" :(

May chaos take the world!

Re: Googlebook

#907
I see the vision here, which the top commenters (sorry, couldn't read all of them) seems to miss. This should be a moonshot bet on the next generation of user experience. People are complaining about apps, but the idea here should be to make apps irrelevant as a concept. You don't need "apps", you need data feedable to LLM and a visualization toolkit for presenting results. And maybe some tools to manually wrangle the data when precise manipulation is required.

On paper, this sounds amazing. Like "out of sci-fi books" amazing. The caveat, though? I very much doubt Google has the capacity to execute this properly. And we'll get another half-baked attempt at reskinning Chromium and/or Android.

Re: Googlebook

#908
I will never understand how these huge companies are so bad at branding. Why not call it Geminibook? If you want the emphasis to be their AI solution... sigh.

Re: Googlebook

#909
post #908

I will never understand how these huge companies are so bad at branding. Why not call it Geminibook? If you want the emphasis to be their AI solution... sigh.

Or, hear me out, GooBook.
Post reply on HN