Earlier quoted context omitted.
>>> "It's the White House that wanted Trump to be candidate. They played Republican primary voters" The original comment did seem to imply that the 'White House' was in control, with a plan, and 'played' the Republicans. The original comment made the connection that Democrats were taking action. If I'm allowed to assume that when someone makes a comment, that sentences are related. That sentences can follow one anoth…
> The original comment made the connection that Democrats were taking action. Yes, it claims that the Democrats took action. That does not equate to blaming Democrats. You could blame the Democrats for what they supposedly did if that's what the randomly firing neurons in your brain conclude is most appropriate in light of the "facts" presented, but blame is just arbitrary thought. It doesn't mean anything and certai…
You also agreed with me in that interpretation.
Your reply >>> "Yes, that is what he thinks. Did you not read the comment? It is, like, uh, right there...
"
Are you sure you aren't using this circular logic to keep someone engaged, in order to have someone to talk to?